Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de to YUROP@lemm.ee · 4 months agoSorry, Deutsch peoplediscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1903arrow-down115
arrow-up1888arrow-down1imageSorry, Deutsch peoplediscuss.tchncs.deServais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de to YUROP@lemm.ee · 4 months agomessage-square147fedilink
minus-squareFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 months agoEveryone uses the name that China used. I guess that’s the benefit and downside of only having one neighbor.
minus-squareFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoThis caused me to think about upside versus downside and benefit versus some word that isn’t anti-benefit, unbenefit, abenefit, ilbenefit, irbenefit, imbenefit, inbenefit, debenefit, disbenefit. There is no etymological related antonym to benefit.
Everyone uses the name that China used. I guess that’s the benefit and downside of only having one neighbor.
This caused me to think about upside versus downside and benefit versus some word that isn’t anti-benefit, unbenefit, abenefit, ilbenefit, irbenefit, imbenefit, inbenefit, debenefit, disbenefit. There is no etymological related antonym to benefit.
malefit?
I like the way you think