• r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, but you need to factor in the distance to the transmitter. Going to add at least a few microseconds to your time accuracy!

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sync process? The other comment was talking about the old receivers for the atomic clocks on SW/MW frequencies. It was a one way thing.

          Now in theory if a receiver also had GPS they could account for the distance. But, then they’d get far more accurate time from the GPS receiver so…

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          The watches/clocks they are talking about listened to WWV, a set of radio stations transmitting from Fort Collins, Colorado. The system long predates the Network Time Protocol you’re referring to. Radio controlled clocks/watches had no means for accounting for latency.

          • Unforeseen
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ahh OK my bad. I’ve only worked with NTP for a long time and wasn’t aware of the earlier stuff.