- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
George Orwell’s archives provide an invaluable insight into one of the most influential British writers of the 20th century, casting light on how he produced his most memorable books, his sensitivity to criticism, and his fears that legal threats could ruin his work. Now the treasure trove that is the extensive archive of correspondence and contracts amassed by Orwell’s original publisher, Victor Gollancz, could be scattered to the winds in what has been described as an act of “cultural vandalism”.
Crucial correspondence involving the Nineteen Eighty-Four author and Observer correspondent is being offered for sale on the open market, following a decision in 2018 by the publisher’s parent company to sell the archive because the warehouse was closing.
Richard Blair, 80 – whose father Eric Blair wrote under the pen-name George Orwell – is dismayed by the loss: “It’s terribly sad … Once Gollancz material is acquired by private collectors, it could disappear into the ether for ever.”
Jean Seaton, director of the Orwell Foundation, said: “That nobody had opened those filing cabinets for 50 years was because they were idiots and didn’t understand the archive’s value. Why didn’t their board consult experts and historians, who would have understood that they needed perhaps to make some revenue from it, but would have understood the real public worth? Instead, they have dispersed a national archive.”
The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Guardian:
Search topics on Ground.News
https://www.theguardian.com/books/article/2024/aug/17/it-could-disappear-for-ever-anger-over-sale-of-george-orwell-archive
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support
I don’t know if the teacher is available for everybody but you can block this account. I’m going to do that right now so I don’t have to see this anymore. This alone makes me hate ground news calling the guardian mixed on factual reporting. Unless somebody knows something I don’t. besides just being a left leaning news source.
Edit: I haven’t been informed it’s not ground news questioning the factuality and downloading is actually a better tactic because it lets them know it’s unwanted.
I find these stupid bots to be a nuisance primarily because they make every Lemmy post appear to have comments, only to click them and see this worthless advertisement.
Many of us left Reddit because of advertisements. Why would we tolerate them here?
That is the fundamental problem with this bot. It’s not responding to the article. It doesn’t add to the discussion. It actually introduces bias.
I prefer to downvote because if everyone who doesn’t like it blocks it then it won’t get downvoted and people might assume there’s general agreement with the misinformation shared by the bot.
This is a really good point.
Don’t block it, just downvote it on sight so that it gets pushed to the bottom of everyone’s view.
Also, it’s MBFC saying the Guardian is mixed, not ground.news.