• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    The having fewer billionaires is always left out and always the reason none of the other stuff seems to matter

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why would renewable energy necessarily mean fewer billionaires? Major solar/wind generation plants have to be built by someone and somewhere, it seems like the best you’re doing is making billionaires pivot their investments/changing which people the billionaires are.

      • ShareMySims
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s called ✨nationalised/socialised utilities✨.

        Imagine not being able to even, well, imagine, a world where profit isn’t the one and only motive for human behaviour… 🙄

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why does moving to renewables necessarily mean nationalized/socialized utilities? Imagine not being able to imagine a world where one thing you support is not inexorably tied to every other thing you support.