Christian Dingus, 28, was with his partner when, he says, employees told the couple not to kiss inside, and the argument escalated outside.

A gay man accused a group of Washington, D.C., Shake Shack employees of beating him after he kissed his boyfriend inside the location while waiting for their order.

Christian Dingus, 28, was with his partner and a group of friends at a Dupont Circle location Saturday night when the incident occurred, he told NBC News. They had put in their order and were hanging around waiting for their food.

“And while we were back there — kind of briefly — we began to kiss,” Dingus said. “And at that point, a worker came out to us and said that, you know, you can’t be doing that here, can’t do that type of stuff here.”

The couple separated, Dingus said, but his partner got upset at the employee and insisted the men had done nothing wrong. Dingus’ partner was then allegedly escorted out of the restaurant, where a heated verbal argument occurred.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    6 个月前

    Because I was prefacing my statement in an attempt to ward off misunderstandings about whose side I was on. I underestimated the degree to which people lack a sense of nuance apparently, though

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 个月前

      What ‘nuance’ is there about speculating that two assaulted gay people were kissing harder than they described?

      As you yourself say, it does not have any bearing on the violence done to them being acceptable. So why link those two things together with a comma but?

      • Jakeroxs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 个月前

        That it’s possible it’s less to do with them being gay and more to do with them potentially making out heavily and making the workers uncomfortable, which is possible if they were a straight couple too instead.

        Not condoning the violence in the slightest

          • Jakeroxs
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            6 个月前

            I don’t know what happened, I just understand what the person’s point was in bringing it up and can also understand that they’re not condoning or justifying the violence that occurred at all.

              • Jakeroxs
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                6 个月前

                That’s absolutely not at all what they were saying, idk if you’re reading a different comment or something.

                  • Jakeroxs
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    14
                    ·
                    6 个月前

                    I hope one day you see how crazy this sounds, if it’s not intentional.

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 个月前

          potentially making out heavily

          You get attacked on your commute.

          I say: “It’s terrible you were dragged out of your car and hit, that’s not acceptable!”

          I then add: “You probably were driving badly, though, which pissed people off.”

          The second sentence modified the first, yes?

          • Jakeroxs
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            6 个月前

            Yeah it does of course, however wanting to know the facts of the situation isn’t the same as making an excuse for the behavior exhibited.