From the article: OLED and MicroLED are the future

  • jubilationtcornpone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 years ago

    Now if I could just a “dumb” TV that doesn’t have a bunch of built in apps, which apparently is now a huge ask. I just want my TV to display whatever HDMI port is currently selected. Not nag me about connecting it to WiFi every time I turn it on.

    • thumbman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Look into commercial displays. They are meant for store fronts and guest areas. These screens are typically built a bit more robust than consumer TVs. They may only have one of each input ports, may lack soundboard and built-in tuners, but they have sleeker designs and lack smartTV bloatware. You may need more peripheral equipment for the screen to function as a home use TV. Just do a little research and see if this works for your setup.

      • mnemonicmonkeys
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I might look into this for a table to play Pathfinder and D&D on. I’ve been looking for a cheap, durable, no frills display to build a table around.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      But then how would they get that sweet sweet metric data they can resell? Think of the megacorps!

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think there are expensive models that come without any software shit. However I simply “gave up” and don’t connect the TV to any network. It doesn’t see a network cable and won’t get my wifi credentials. Therefore it neither needs nor receives updates. Everything “smart” is done by an attached Kodi box and a FireTV stick, which I both can exchange when their time is up.

    • ChickenAndRice
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This might not be a solution that fits your needs, but personally this is why I buy computer monitors instead of TVs now

        • ChickenAndRice
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I personally use a 28 inch monitor, although I’m hoping to upgrade to a 32-35 inch ultrawide soon.

          I don’t really watch TV in a living room. Instead I have my monitor sitting on my desk, so I don’t share the screen with anyone else. Thus, my situation might be different than yours. Hope that helps

          Edit: bad grammar

    • mtlvmpr@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have LG C1 that’s not connected to the internet and I have not noticed any nagging. Pretty much just switch between HDMI outputs and that’s it. Thankfully the input switch and apps are behind a different button unlike Samsung and their overly simple remote. (can even hold number button to switch to a specific source without menus)

    • fadedmaster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I just disabled the “smart” features on my Samsung S95B and set it to run the last used “app.” Which is just the last used input.

      It’s not perfect, but combined with HDMI CEC I almost never need to go into the ugly menu. I don’t mind the smart menus of the older TVs when it was a separate part of the TV you could ignore. But the integration in these new TVs where inputs are treated like another smart app and you have to go past apps to get to picture settings is just bad design.

      Not to mention serving ads for each manufacturer’s own streaming apps on a device someone spent a lot of money on us completely unethical. But at least disabling the Internet features took care of that issue.

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yikes! So you mean you just can’t switch inputs without the smart TV side anymore? Time to avoid the Samsungs then…

        • fadedmaster
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          You can switch inputs. But it forces you to go through the home screen to do so. And to make things worse, game consoles are relegated to a different section of the home screen (there’s gaming and media).

          It’s an awful user experience initially. But once I disabled a lot of it and just got a Roku, it’s a great TV. But I wasn’t going to spend the extra nearly $1k to get the Sony QD-OLED, and I have beef with LG since they made me wait nearly four months trying to get a refrigerator repaired or replaced under warranty (and it was a no cool problem… Not like a broken ice maker or something). So I stay away from LG.

          • Sens@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I had the same battle with Samsung over my fridge. Never buying a Samsung fridge again after this, had 2 replacements under warranty since October 2020, which is when I bought it.

            • fadedmaster
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              It’s crazy isn’t it? I used to work in electronics and appliance repair. No cool calls were given top priority and if we couldn’t fix it within days, most warranties would just replace it. This was only a decade ago. I am so glad I don’t have to stand in a customer’s home and tell them they’re SOL because Samsung, LG or any other company won’t authorize replacement/buyout, despite being unable to repair it due to the lack of available parts.

  • AaronMaria@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have been reading about MicroLEDs for years now, never bought any OLED because of the burn-in. I’m curious when MicroLEDs will actually hit the mass-market and at what price-point and also how they will scale for smaller screens.

    • fadedmaster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve had my QD-OLED for a little while now and it has had quite a bit of static images on it without any trouble. From what I read before I bought it, OLEDs in general really don’t have a burn-in issue like the early models did.

      From what I can tell they’re better than even plasma was at the end. And you’d have trouble actively trying to get permanent burn in on some later model plasmas. I used to service TVs and appliances. In most cases outside of using a plasma display for digital signage, I’d be able to run a swiping pattern for a little bit to get rid of the image retention. The only exception I really had for a plasma that was used in a residence was an older couple who didn’t have a widescreen source and only watched shows in 4:3 aspect ratio. They finally got the HD channels from their TV provider and realized they had the bars on the sides burned in (really the screen aged unevenly).

      • My wife and I bought our used OLED for just under $900. The screen had maybe 400 hours of use on it. In the 8 months since then, we’ve added another 900 or so hours. Some days, I’m playing Zelda all day. Other days, we don’t turn it on at all. Only thing it didn’t have was the feet, which was okay since we were always going to mount it.

        I have no regrets about buying an OLED TV so far. As far as I’ve read, these screens can run 40-80k hours and still retain half their original brightness. Assuming I get 60k out of mine and it takes 8 months to add 900 hours, I’ve got 43 years before the screen is down to 50% brightness. I’m planning to replace it in ten or fifteen anyway.

        The depths in Tears of the Kingdom look DAMN GOOD on an OLED, especially in a dark room.

    • boopeditandnow
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am using a 14 year old plasma TV still, which were/are notorious for burn-in. It does have a few spots, but they’re only noticeable if you’re looking at a completely white screen. It made me not care about burn-in, kinda like how getting the first dent on your car is a relief after a while.

      I’m going to splurge on a nice OLED whenever this thing breaks (I really wish it would break…I want 4K and all the new features.)

  • RedMarsRepublic@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can they please just bring back actual buttons instead of invisible tap points where you can’t tell where the fuck they are?

    • candyman337@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      These days most tvs have the “nipple” navigation which initially seems stupid but is genuinely the most natural navigation system I’ve ever used

    • imaqtpieA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No. You’ll suffer the invisible tap points because they can advertise that feature and charge more money.

      How do you fuck up televisions? It’s the simplest thing and these corporations just need to fucking meddle.

        • Doghound@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I believe miniLED was a marketing term intended to mislead customers into thinking it was similar technology to OLED. Since most consumers don’t even know what LEDs are, it probably worked.

          LCD displays have, for some time now, had LED behind them. Said LEDs produce the white light needed to display the image produced by the LCD panel. MiniLED just provides groupings of the LED panel so that they can be individually turned off to produce darker darks.

          • HidingCat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes, that’s what I thought too, but as beefcat said, I conflated Mini and Micro; MicroLEDs seem be non-OLEDs, so to speak. I hope I understood that part correctly!

    • Noumena@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Mine flickers when room temp is above 75 and gets jacked at 78.

      The G3 is looking extremely appealing in all dimensions except price.

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same, I have a plasma and it works great, doesn’t even know what HD ready means, but displays 1080i.

      As long as HD is the max res the TV box gives, I don’t see reason for an upgrade. (especially for a luxury item that is mostly background noice/movement)

    • plum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I, too, won’t replace something until it dies. Even if an upgrade is long overdue.

  • Shrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am going to skip LCD tvs altogether. Right now I am still using my first hd tv, a Plasma TV from 2008, and when I replace it, it will likely be with an OLED.

  • eee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s great, it means LCD TVs have hit maturation point.

  • errbodwangchung@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Man I’m still rocking my Samsung plasma TV from 2011. No need to heat the house with the amount that TV gives off but still works great.

    • bfg9k@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have an old Viera 50 inch Plasma, it chews like 240W while running but has not skipped a beat in the 13 years we’ve had it

      • ImFresh3x
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had a viera for 14 years. For 1080p content it beats my OLED. Better motion and better pixel alignment. But it died a third time. And I decided I didn’t want to look for parts or break out my soldering iron the 3rd time. It was my gym/garage tv at that point I I rarely used it.

  • Eribetra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I really hope microLED takes off in the near future. It’s basically OLED on steroids, all of its advantages without the risk of screen burn-in. It’s just too expensive right now…

    • glitchinthematrix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      What about Hisense with the U8H Class are they using microled(they call it miniled)? this Tv is not that expensive compared with other brands and tbh the image quality in the high-end models are awesome.

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fair enough. LCD is very old technology at this point, dating back to the 1960s.

    Of course, LEDs aren’t exactly new either, but microscopic LEDs bright enough to be used as pixels certainly are.

    • mglap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, they still get burn in. They also aren’t very bright out of the box, and they get dimmer over time. They’re also more expensive than LCDs despite having a limited lifespan. I’ve never been a fan of OLEDs for these reasons and my theory is that manufacturers want to sell them because they have a limited life span so they can sell more.

      MicroLED I’m super pumped for though. No clue when we can actually expect to buy them though.

  • Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    LCD TVs can still improve via faster refresh rates, strolling backlights, and smaller local dimming zones. If the last part can be made small enough, then it would be very hard to tell the difference between an LCD screen and a emissive display. These facts shouldn’t be ignored by display companies.

    • beefcat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The problem is that we are reaching a point where it is cheaper to achieve the same or better results with OLED or microLED than by dumping even more money into improving LCD.

      We are already at a point where OLED provides a straight up better value than LCD in higher end price brackets as long as peak brightness is not your #1 priority.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m going to have see a display that truly solves the burn-in problem before making that proclamation.

    • ImFresh3x
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dimming zones creat halo affects when there white next to black. Source: typing on my 12.9 iPad lcd with dimming zones.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The smaller the dimming zones, the lesser this effect becomes. Theoretically, you can have dimming zones of just 1 pixel in size. People have even “succeeded” in doing this by bonding two LCD panels together, with one acting as the local dimming solution.