• Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 months ago

    A film that was routinely asked not to be made by fans is shit, suprise.

    The Crow worked due to Brandon Lee, his father’s legacy, and being the 90s. It was a collection of events that made an instant cult classic film.

    • kalpol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Brandon Lee was also a good actor, and had most of the good lines in the film.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fans routinely asked that no one make a Blade Runner sequel too. Sometimes fans don’t know what they’re talking about.

        • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Background: I only watched the original before watching the sequel.

          IMO, the sequel is better.

          I felt like it took everything good about the original and improved upon it.

          My suspicion is that people who prefer the original are nostalgic for it.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Meh, I thought the second would have been a great movie if it was 20-30 minutes shorter. My god some of those scenes drag on.

            The first was ground breaking for its time. I don’t think it is nostalgia (although there is probably some) so much as context. A lot of the things that had people’s jaws on the floor are commonplace now. It’s hard to recreate that illusion especially if you’re comparing it to modern movies.

      • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I enjoyed the new Blade Runner, but it wasn’t anywhere nearly as good as the original. Also, big difference between a sequel and a reboot

      • biofaust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        BR2049 is shit. A mix of uninspired stuff, nice concept art and fan service, with a bad CGI Rachel.

        I love Villeneuve’s work elsewhere, but there he really fucked up.

        • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I completely disagree with it being shit, but your complaints still have some merit. I just think the end product overcomes those flaws by a mile.

          • biofaust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            Except for it being called Blade Runner and not striking any resemblance to the original.

            If it came out as it’s own thing I would have called it a good movie, although a bit bland and with poorly written characters, but as a sequel to Blade Runner, no way.

        • robdor@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You are shit. I base this in the fact that you are shit. Please don’t debate this because I will not be able to defend. In closing fuck you and have a nice day.