teft@lemmy.world to SpaceflightEnglish · 7 个月前NASA decides to keep 2 astronauts in space until February, nixes return on troubled Boeing capsuleapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1198arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-linkNASA decides to keep 2 astronauts in space until February, nixes return on troubled Boeing capsuleapnews.comteft@lemmy.world to SpaceflightEnglish · 7 个月前message-square60fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareJumutalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·7 个月前boeing’s spending the money not nasa, it’s a fixed price contract
minus-squareJumutalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-27 个月前only for starliner as far as i know, every other boeing thing is cost plus
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 个月前finally NASA making decent financial decisions
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 个月前Yep, it only took 50 years of lessons with the same contractors to learn it am I right?
minus-squareBangs42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 个月前Starliner and Crew Dragon both, if we’re talking manned space capsules.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeersMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 个月前No, but it is fixed-price, which I think is what @[email protected] was getting at.
boeing’s spending the money not nasa, it’s a fixed price contract
When has that ever happened?
only for starliner as far as i know, every other boeing thing is cost plus
finally NASA making decent financial decisions
they really dodged the bullet with this one
Yep, it only took 50 years of lessons with the same contractors to learn it am I right?
Starliner and Crew Dragon both, if we’re talking manned space capsules.
crew dragon isn’t Boeing is it
No, but it is fixed-price, which I think is what @[email protected] was getting at.