This comment was in response to someone expressing regret about joining .ml if I recall correctly

Edit: I’m convinced all this guy does is camp out in front of his computer and wait for an excuse to abuse what itty bitty power he has.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It doesn’t.

      Okay, so far you’re in agreement, then, that contrary to your initial claim, ethnic cleansing is NOT an acceptable response, you just disagree as to whether ethnic cleansing is ongoing. Is that correct?

      • goatM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think there are some good arguments about what counts as an ethnic cleansing when the population is entirely homogenous.

        Is what Russia doing to the Ukraine an ethnic cleansing, considering their lack of diversity? What about the lack of diversity in Gaza? Turns into a semantic argument, really.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not sure I understand. Wouldn’t a clear ethnic majority in an area being removed to make way for a minority only make ethnic cleansing more apparent than the reverse?

          Is what Russia doing to the Ukraine an ethnic cleansing, considering their lack of diversity?

          Yes, absolutely.

          • goatM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            What I’m saying is that the laws of what is considered genocide become blurry depending on how diverse that area is.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hamas is the one ethnically cleansing. The IDF isn’t. Remember, Hamas has been very explicit about wanting to kill every single Jew. It’s even in their charter. The IDF meanwhile does not want more Jews to die.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Okay, so far you’re in agreement, then, that contrary to your initial claim, ethnic cleansing is NOT an acceptable response, you just disagree as to whether ethnic cleansing is ongoing. Is that correct?

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You are arguing with someone that believes in the 40 decapitated babies lie because the IDF said so. Just a heads-up that you are wasting your time like I did.

            • Kaboom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              Okay, why would the IDF decapitate 40 babies? Id might believe it if it was some sort of accident, but the only group shown to deliberately kill children is Hamas.

                • Kaboom@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No, the babies were decapitated. The question was whether or not they were dead beforehand.

                  And it wasn’t “onboarding”, lie or otherwise. October 7th was the onboarding, when Hamas broke a ceasefire and massacred over a thousand civilians.

                  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Like it or not, you have to explain your heightened military expenses to your general public and the general public in Western countries do not give the littlest of shits about 1000 murdered civilians in some country they likely couldn’t even point to on a map. 40 decapitated babies is bad and emotionally charged enough to dissuade them into hand-waving ammo and weapon shipments because now they are “making the world a better place”. The definition of onboarding.

                    I won’t reply to you any further than this. You may consider yourself the “winner” of this discussion, but it’s too taxing for my mental health to continue.