• VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look and see if your state has at home Burial services. If they do tell them you want to bury the body at home and you do not want it embalmed. Then buy an absolute fuck ton of Dermestid beetles online. Then, get ready for the horrid smell as they eat the flesh off of your father’s rotting corpse over the course of a year or more.

    • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Didn’t we have a community for unethical life pro tips? This comment would be a perfect post there.

    • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Imagine a neighbor who’s annoying dog barks in their yard sometimes.

      Now imagine a neighbor who’s fathers’s rotting corpse is slowly being eaten by beetles over the course of a year or more.

      • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you bury the body first it should take away a good chunk of the smell but you have to bury it in like a mesh cage almost so the bones and stuff can’t be slowly moved over time by the beetles.

    • Danquebec
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      When I read this, I was curious how possible it would be, if there’s sufficient supply in the market… I found this vendor page. So, there would probably be enough supply as there are taxidermists who need to clean big game skulls, which require thousands of larva and adults, and the vendor say you should email them if you need more than 10’000. I couldn’t learn how much time it would take, but they do say that more = faster, and to communicate with them to fit your project timeline.

  • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s actually the exact opposite to what he says. In the US you can do almost anything you want with human remains, while in Europe it’s much more restricted. In Denmark for example, you have to have the body/ashes buried in a licensed cemetery. You can’t keep the ashes yourself, you can’t bury them in your backyard, you can’t spread them at some random special place (except for the sea in rare circumstances).

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pretty sure this is legal, they just wouldn’t release an unembalmed corpse for health reasons.

    Wouldn’t OP just have to find a qualified mortician willing to do the work?

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    3 months ago

    Apparently there’s no federal law (in the US) banning the ownership of human bones because up until the mid to late 20th century it was apparently common practice for med students to purchase real human bones for their studies. Most of them apparently came from India, until the country banned the export of human remains, which must have played a part in causing the practice to fall out of style.

    If anyone has anything to correct/add, please do so. This was just a quick google search out of morbid curiosity

    • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      I know the POTC ride had a bunch of real skulls (and a few are still there) because, at the time, they were cheaper and easier to get then good looking fakes.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        there was apparently one amusement park ride that ended up getting its hands on a literal corpse of a human, only to be discovered when one of the arms broke off while someone was moving it.

        apparently, the corpse in particular, was that of a notorious criminal who nobody really liked, so some fuckwit decided it would be funny to preserve his body and put it up for exhibition. And then it just kinda, continued from there, until it was discovered.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            there was definitely room somewhere along the line for numerous parties to never discover it, but at some point somebody inevitably would’ve discovered it, preserved bodies aren’t exactly the most “durable” of things.

      • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s only 1 still inside the ride. I can’t remember if it was always only one but it’s the skull on the crossbones above the throne towards the end of the ride.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The reason India stopped that is because they realized they were exporting way too many human skeletons and way too many child skeletons in that, so they eventually realized that this meant there were mass murders involved. India to this day has problems with that but it’s become better.

      Here’s an interview of a guy who went underground to familiarize himself with the problem and even talked to a bunch of people involved. It’s a great video :)

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP76ekb_DxI

      • TheSlad
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        My highschool biology classroom had the skeleton of an indian tween in a closet. It had been professionally skeletonized and rigged up and everything. The bio teacher swore it was there when he started teaching and that he doesnt know anything about it…

        He also had a human fetus preserved in a jar of formaldehyde.

    • Who knew?
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s true. My aunt had the skeleton of a person, probably from India, for use when she was in medical school in the '80s. She took him on the bus with her in a bigass suitcase I guess. They talked about it as if it wasn’t fucked up.

  • spacecadet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    they can keep the meat

    I just want the skeleton

    Peak autismo mode

    • taladar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      What would be the point? Space marine armor is fully enclosed, nobody would see the skeleton anyway.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Akshully, a significant portion of them prefers to fight without a helmet where possible, for various reasons such as chapter culture or certain gene seed variants. The primarchs are also often depicted without helmets, but considering the lore is essentially imperial propaganda it might make sense to depict them that way for PR reasons.

        • taladar
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wearing insanely heavy armor only to leave the helmet off seems like the kind of thing so obviously stupid it should be kept out of propaganda material at all costs.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Not defending the practice in a combat scenario because that’s obviously dumb especially in the uber warfare that’s happening in 40k. Virus bombs that can destroy entire ecosystems in proverbial seconds, rounds and shells with more diameter than a fucking bus, chaos sorcery of the worst kind is a frequent encounter as well.

            But for propaganda material it makes a lot of sense I’d say, the masses need to see their heroes’ faces. There are also some marine chapters that use mutated or otherwise extreme gene seed when making their warriors, for example one chapter becomes a lot more animalistic in its physical characteristics and the helmet negatively impacts their altered natural senses.

    • Another Catgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Would be more ethical to buy a full body autopsy CT scan its’s only a fewthousands dollars) to get a 3D model, then 3D print a replica of his skeleton out of something not biodegradable.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    …how would a coroner go about removing a skeleton without destroying the body? I’m pretty sure this is nowhere in a coroner job description. I’d tell him the same thing.

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    You Can’t Keep Your Parents’ Skulls [Caitlin Doughty | September 4, 2019 | theatlantic.com]

    Under U.S. law, it’s nearly impossible to get permission to decapitate and de-flesh a relative’s remains.

    Abuse-of-corpse laws exist for a reason. They protect people’s bodies from being mistreated (ahem, necrophilia). They also prevent a corpse from being snatched from the morgue and used for research or public exhibition without the dead person’s consent. History is littered with such violations. Medical professionals have stolen corpses and even dug up fresh graves to get bodies for dissection and research. Then there are cases like that of Julia Pastrana, a 19th-century Mexican woman with a condition called hypertrichosis, which caused hair to grow all over her face and body. After she died, her husband saw that there was money to be made by displaying Pastrana in freak shows, so he took her embalmed and taxidermied corpse on world tour. Pastrana had ceased to be regarded as human; her corpse had become a possession.

    So where do skulls on bookcases come from? In the United States, no federal law prevents owning, buying, or selling human remains, unless the remains are Native American. Otherwise, whether you’re able to sell or own human remains is decided by each individual state. At least 38 states have laws that should prevent the sale of human remains, but in reality the laws are vague, confusing, and enforced at random. In one seven-month period in 2012–13, 454 human skulls were listed on eBay, with an average opening bid of just under $650 (eBay subsequently banned the practice).

    If there were any legal wiggle room that might allow a person to get Dad’s head liberated from its fleshy shell, Tanya Marsh would know how to find it. Marsh is a law professor and the expert on human-remains law. “I will argue with you all day long,” she told me, “that it isn’t legal in any state in the United States to reduce a human head to a skull.”[1]


    1. [1] https://archive.ph/SE19g ↩︎

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your height varies a surprising amount as your spinal column compresses - this seems to be more pronounced in tall people (not sure why - we don’t have extra vertebrae).

      As an example, measure your height in the morning and before you go to bed.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    im gonna force (post mortem) whatever morgue that has to deal with my body upon death to rip all my teeth out so i can send them to my friends.

    I’ve got worse ideas. Apparently there’s a company or was, idk if it’s still around that would preserve tats from the skin of the now longer alive individual. I’m really tempted to get a tattoo of a dashed grid on my back, with numbered squares (2x2inches per square for example) just so i can tell people that when i die it’s going to be removed, segmented, preserved, and then sent to people that knew me.