• conciselyverbose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can’t make them breathe all their smoke in if there’s sufficient air circulation.

    What he’s describing can’t not result in decreased access to oxygen.

    • otp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you might be taking his words too literally

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        What he’s advocating is deranged so he must be joking?

        He said what he said.

        • otp
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What he’s advocating is his literal words are sound deranged so he must be joking speaking figuratively?

          Yeah, that’s usually how that works.

          • conciselyverbose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, that’s not usually how it works. It’s never how it works. This isn’t satire. It’s an actual proposal.

            People advocating for unhinged bullshit do so because and only because they believe in it. There is no alternate interpretation of “lock people in a closed space with their smoke to punish them”. If there was sufficient airflow the smoke would be gone in seconds.