No one is “capable for” the job, it’s not a realistic responsibility. But at least the other two have approximated suitability. Trump, as poorly as he did and terrible as he is, at least has experience now. In terms of tangible evidence, they both have considerably more experience in high ranking leadership roles than Stein.
Trump got in without experience because he had a huge cult of personality and Russian help. Kamala has held numerous high offices. What has Jill Stein done? Policy positions are nice and all, but without any record of implementation that’s useless. Why do all of these this party candidates shoot straight for President? It almost seems like they’re intentionally spoiling the vote to help Trump.
Just because the other two aren’t capable doesn’t make the third option capable.
What a rank, imbecilic attempt at logic. Based on your other comments in this thread, you don’t know how to have a reasonable argument with anyone without first having some sarcastic response. Why should any of us listen to anything you have to say if you come back with disingenuity? Not only are you delusional and childish, you’re absolutely insufferable.
En je handvat, “linkerbaan”, het lijkt meer op pechstrook. Grinniken mijn ballen, stomme Amerikaan.
The other two have proven not to be capable for the job.
No one is “capable for” the job, it’s not a realistic responsibility. But at least the other two have approximated suitability. Trump, as poorly as he did and terrible as he is, at least has experience now. In terms of tangible evidence, they both have considerably more experience in high ranking leadership roles than Stein.
Trump got in without experience because he had a huge cult of personality and Russian help. Kamala has held numerous high offices. What has Jill Stein done? Policy positions are nice and all, but without any record of implementation that’s useless. Why do all of these this party candidates shoot straight for President? It almost seems like they’re intentionally spoiling the vote to help Trump.
Just because the other two aren’t capable doesn’t make the third option capable.
What a rank, imbecilic attempt at logic. Based on your other comments in this thread, you don’t know how to have a reasonable argument with anyone without first having some sarcastic response. Why should any of us listen to anything you have to say if you come back with disingenuity? Not only are you delusional and childish, you’re absolutely insufferable.
En je handvat, “linkerbaan”, het lijkt meer op pechstrook. Grinniken mijn ballen, stomme Amerikaan.
The third party does not support Genocide that’s the base for being capable. Project harder though.
The squirrels in my backyard don’t support genocide either, which by your logic makes them equally capable as Stein.
They also have just as much chance of being elected and fewer ties to Putin. Squirrels 2024!