• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    Her job last night was to get him shook, then back off and let him be insane. She nailed it.

    • lurch (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      idk. she should have said “no, we’re not doing that” a few times. some people will see this as a silent admission of guilt.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You can’t respond to every single allegation. If you did that you’d spend the whole night talking about things you don’t want to be talking about.

        The best (I was tempted to write easiest, but it’s actually not easy at all) thing to do is to let him rattle on and allow the audience see just how unhinged he is, and then stay on point and talk about what you actually want to talk about.

        He was trying his best to respond to every damning fact that she dropped about him, and that’s a large part of the reason he lost so thoroughly.

        She let him cry himself to sleep. For a childless lady, she sure knows how to handle a petulant child.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        She did on the whole, “They’re only planning on taking your guns away!” bit that he used as a rebuttal to her actual sound and reasonable plans.