The court concluded that pregnant women in the state have a “fundamental right to choose abortion before viability exists under the enumerated and unenumerated interests protected by” the state’s constitution.
“The Court concludes [the law] violates the Constitution of the State of North Dakota and is void for vagueness and of no effect,” the order said.
Romanick wrote that implicit in the right to personal autonomy, liberty and happiness is “a woman’s right and responsibility to decide what her pregnancy demands of her in the context of her life and in the context of her health.”
“Prior to viability, a woman must retain the ultimate control over her own destiny, her own body, and ultimately the path of her life,” he continued. "A woman’s choice of whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term shapes the very nature and future course of her life, on nearly every possible level. The Court finds that such a choice, at least pre-viability, must belong to the individual woman and not to the government. "
Good news
Still concerning as “viability” moves up with medical advances.
That crossed my mind as well. They’re just going to fight over that one word for forever now.
Meanwhile in Nebraska:
Competing abortion rights measures can appear on Nebraska ballot, high court rules
One initiative would enshrine in the Nebraska Constitution the right to have an abortion until viability or later to protect the health of the pregnant woman. The other would write into the constitution Nebraska’s current 12-week abortion ban, passed by the Legislature in 2023. The ban includes exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the pregnant woman.