• @DudeImMacGyver
    link
    English
    105 hours ago

    Maybe they should try making a good pokemon game instead

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1511 hours ago

        So putting shit in a box is apparently Nintendos invention!

        Do they get royaltys for shipping goods?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1013 hours ago

        This is a weird patent; it seems to be describing something more akin to Pokemon Home than an actual in-game mechanic, but then the references talk about the pokemon storage system, so who knows?

      • @Hideakikarate
        link
        English
        1415 hours ago

        Their list of patents is enormous. They could throw darts drunk and in the dark, miss the board completely, and still likely land on something they could claim.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -3515 hours ago

      Maybe not on that, but the creatures in Palworld are sometimes a direct ripoff of Pokémon. I’m with Nintendo on this one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Oh no, both the wolves look like wolves. Never mind they have different color schemes and geometry; look, they’re both wolves!

        I approached the claims with an open mind, but when I read that the worst offender was the wolf I realized that none of the claims could possibly hold water.

      • @SolOrion
        link
        English
        29
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        That’s irrelevant. You can’t patent fantasy creatures. That’s a copyright issue. If they were suing for copyright infringement I might think they had a point, but they’re not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1813 hours ago

          I think the fact they’re going for a patent suit says they probably think they don’t have enough of an argument for a copyright suit which kind of makes sense. Just because the designs are similar doesn’t mean it’s copyright infringement.

  • Computerchairgeneral
    link
    fedilink
    1915 hours ago

    Kind of surprised it took this long to be honest. Also a little surprised it’s a patent lawsuit, but then again it might be easier to prove infringement on a gameplay concept you have patented rather than copyright.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      This isn’t some guy who has loved their products for years and wanted to express how much joy he’s had from them by writing a comic about them - they can’t just go sue them immediately. This is a corporation, they have to make sure that it’s the right move. Come on, that’s Corpo 101