• anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    109
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    And yet when piecemealed liberals and Republicans will completely embrace the aspects of project 2025. The same way they’re doing KOSA which originated with the HF

    • finley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not as bad as schilling for the Russian plant Jill Stein— or acting like a traitor to promote a foreign power during an election.

      You don’t know anyone like that, do you?

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is so self-evidently preposterous I don’t even know what I could add to further refute it.

      What do you think people hate about it, the name? Come on. Hatred for the proposals in it is the most bipartisan thing I’ve seen in a decade at least.

        • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, project 2025, loaded with unpopular ideas, opposed primarily by democrats, is actually a democrat wetdream. Because democrats have proven repeatedly their agenda is always rolling back human rights /s

          It’s moronic. You discredit yourself so hard, it’s actually hard to top your own words.

            • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The militant communist is getting their catchphrase from the Brady Bunch. Which btw wasn’t a cool reference 15 years ago either. lol

              Not to mention that you want to imply that democrats long for the dissolution of human rights but you know saying it outright is laughably indefensible even by your standards, so you keep quiet on that and toss out your little snarky deflection.

              • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                2 months ago

                Your party voted in favor of anti-trans legislation which was bipartisan in sponsors and cosponsors. Written by a Democrat and a Republican. But instead of calling it an anti trans bill it was presented as saving kids, KOSA

                • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Notice how you hide behind the fact that it likely was bad legislation just by the name of it and refuse to explain what you are talking about in any way. How is this “anti-trans”? You might be right (doubt it outside of some particular edge cases, but prove me wrong). But you’re begging me to dismiss you by just being condescending about it.