Who can suggest an ethical SMTP provider for low volume transactional mail? I’m willing to pay up to 2€/month for a few hundred mails per month.

  • FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t know what you mean by “ethical”, but I use Sendgrid. They have a free tier that can send up to 100 emails a day.

      • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, sorry it’s not a precise term. I mean a non asshole company.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Mostly that they respect the privacy of my users and that they don’t have shady business practices that want to push you towards an over-expensive paid tier.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Amazing! Now this is something I haven’t heard of. I think we might have a winner here! Best thing, I could use it for transactional mail on all my websites for 10€/yr. Including as many inboxes as needed. Nice!

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    You could use some containerized mail server like Mailcow. They’re pretty alright to set up and should work fine for low volume. At least in my experience. Unless you don’t want to deal with mail yourself, then you should maybe consider a paid service. But I don’t have any experience with those.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I specifically want to not deal with deliverability beyond the content and volume of my mails.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Agreed, and well-articulated. I think you (OP) need to ask yourself whether you’re willing to pay the appropriate market rate for the service or not. I don’t know what that is, but I expect it’s higher than you’ve expressed.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “Low volume” vs. “A few hundred mails per month”

    OK, what of the above?

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is something you used to be able to do for free, no problem. It’s only a few of the big mail accepting companies being extra shitty about accepting mail making this tough. Looking at you Microsoft. So a few hundred mails per month is ridiculous both on storage, bandwidth and CPU consumption.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I know. I was there, before Sanford Wallace invented the email spam and forced any sane SMTP server into password protections and whitelists.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      A few hundred a month is just a few per day. That is pretty low volume by most standards.

      I would say in general if the SMTP server could be replaced by a single human writing and mailing snail-mail letters by hand it qualifies as low volume.