D-11 dozer rolled down the embankment and they had to use the dragline to pull it out

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would have figured a 32L engine put out more power than that. It’s comparable to the 800hp in our silage chopper with an 18L.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s the gearing and weight that make a dozer powerful. I’ve worked first hand with D-11s around me, and they are incredible machines.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh, absolutely. I’ve never used anything bigger than a 6, but driven a few 40k# 4WD tractors that are putting down 6 or 700 hp with much smaller displacement engines than that, though I wonder about comparative duty cycles since they’ll never see more than about 7-10k hours before an overhaul. I also see 3406s with way more hours than that without rebuilds, or maybe just a cylinder done in their lifetimes.

          • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Lower compression ratios are a common trick to increase longevity and fuel compatibility. You reduce horsepower and fuel efficiency, but gain reliability.

  • The dozer has an enclosed compartment, but that like like a pretty violent tumble. Was the driver’s compartment (which isn’t really identifiable) enough to protect the driver, or is s/he now part of the machine?

    Also: Badger 288 would have simple eaten the dozer, and added it to the souls its already reaped.