Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1908arrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1896arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square124fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareproti@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·3 months agoit’s very much ai, generation?
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoPretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
minus-squarecelsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down7·3 months agonope. it’s the plural.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 months agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoStill wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down11·edit-23 months ago`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images. I was thinking of “genus”.
minus-squareEthalis@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up17·3 months agoI think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·edit-23 months ago“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoDerp, that’s what I was thinking of.
minus-squareKrauerking@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoThey apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out Generated?
Genera?
Genre.
it’s very much ai,
generation?
Have, you lost Ted?
Pretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
deleted by creator
nope. it’s the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.I was thinking of “genus”.
I think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
Derp, that’s what I was thinking of.
They apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out
Yeah…no it isn’t.