A Detroit judge who was temporarily removed after ordering a teenager into jail clothes and handcuffs during a field trip is back on the bench but assigned to speeding tickets and other relatively minor offenses.

Judge Kenneth King lost courtroom duties in August and was ordered into social-emotional training by the chief judge at 36th District Court. Instead of handling key hearings in major felonies, he returned this week to the court’s traffic division.

“We appreciate his efforts in preparing for this role, and wish him success as he transitions into this new responsibility,” Judge William McConico said in a written statement.

  • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We really don’t want to live in a world where judges have to fear making decisions.

    This is bad. That would be much worse.

    Edit ITT: People who desperately need to pick up a history book

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      We absolutely do want to live in a world where judges have to fear making decisions like putting innocent teenagers into jail clothes and handcuffs.

    • SMillerNL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think decisions they take outside their role as a judge can be punished just fine.

    • Pissman2020@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      He didn’t make that decision as a judge performing his duties, he made it as an egotistical dickhead being an egotistical dickhead

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Qualifies immunity only exists for certain things. More than most would think. So if he’s personally liable, I’m in favor of it.

      Cops, judges, and other government officials need to… I dunno, be familiar with the Constitution they likely swore to support.

    • IAmNotACat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not like this was a case that was brought before him. He didn’t have to decide anything.

      Just like you didn’t have to decide to be a condescending prick when people started disagreeing with you.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Edit ITT: People who desperately need to pick up a history book

      You’re the one arguing that people in positions of power shouldn’t be held accountable if they abuse their power.

    • SoJB@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Typical liberal “rules for me but not for thee” BS. And to top it off, you add the cute little sneer at the end as an edit.

      Christ you people are predictable.