• TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For anyone on this thread who doesn’t know who Ken Klip is, please check out his free Substack (and subscribe if you can). I wasn’t on Twitter very long (maybe 1.5 years before Elmong took over) but one of the people I value that I ran into on that platform is Ken Klippenstein and I’ve been following him since. He’s amazing at filing thousands of FOIA requests and doing the digging into them that no mainstream journalist does anymore. He also recently quit The Intercept because they were enshittifying far more than he was comfortable with, which for a writer is a huge thing to leave the umbrella of a company like that and a paycheck behind. Writers going out on their own in this climate is the only way we’ll stay even remotely unfucked in the post-information (or misinformation) age.

    Klip fuckin rules. Please give him some due.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is pretty much a summary of a lot of already public data. Could be valuable as an appendix of ways to attack Vance but otherwise not much new here.

      My takeaway is the Trump campaign was too sycophantic to Trump to notice Vance’s actual problems. They have records of his weird views on domestic violence and other strange views but they’re buried in mountains of data about everything he’s said about Trump. And his obsession with childless women isn’t in the document anywhere as far as I can tell.

    • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Out of the criticisms I have of Vance, I do have to say that he wears the Trump uniform better than Trump himself.

  • Reality Suit@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Musk is a fucking anti American liability. How the fuck does he have access to military contracts

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well, despite its owner, SpaceX is actually doing cool and useful stuff. Nobody else bothered with the reusable rocket thing until they made it happen. Starship is on the way to becoming the world’s first 100% reusable orbital transport system, propulsively landing the second stage as well as the first. Soon as they get those toasty melty flaps figured out.

      It just sucks that he’s in control of it.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        People forget Musk isn’t actually technically smart, he’s just good at buying into and investing in already good ideas using money he got by playing the capital machine (and his parents south africa money).
        He didn’t found PayPal; he merged another company with them and capitalized on their already good idea.
        He didn’t found Tesla, he invested in them and then drove the original founders out.
        He did admittedly create SpaceX, but only by bringing on good engineers from the start after failing to buy ICBM’s from Russia. Yes, he tried that… spaceX has been successful only because he gave them the runway to let engineers work right.

        The cult of personality is insane, he’s just another average investor bro who got lucky in the crazy growth of the 90’s/00s.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Maybe NASA would have bothered if its funding hadn’t been cut again and again and again…

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          NASA farms these out to outside companies to build anyway, as seen with the latest Boeing space fiasco, so I don’t necessarily believe this to be true. These defense contractors seem to be interested in little more than milking the US government for all they’re worth.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Sure, because they don’t have any budget themselves…

            • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              They have a $25B yearly budget.

              What is SpaceX spending on R&D? From what I’ve read, Starship is estimated to cost $10B for development and their R&D budget for 2023 was $1.5B. If NASA was going to build something similar themselves, they’ve had nearly 70 years and hundreds of billions to accomplish it.

              In reality their budget goes toward companies like Boeing, Northrop Grummon, and Lockheed Martin, who then pocket it and build substandard equipment. This is all public information so I can’t imagine why people are downvoting other than being extremely emotional for some inexplicable reason.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              What spacecraft do you think they built themselves, without big contractors doing mos5 of the work…?

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I actually prefer NASA to focus on science engineering. There’s a need for private launch capabilities anyway and this way NASA can focus on what they do best.

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            What’s the need for private launch capabilities? Private = capitalist. I don’t see much good in capitalist ventures.

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Because there’s a need for private satellites? Should NASA use limited resources for that?

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m hoping reusables becomes so standard Musks company isn’t needed anymore.

        But that’ll be a long ways off. I agree SpaceX basically revitalized the industry.