Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前There you go little guyslrpnk.netimagemessage-square215fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down178
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageThere you go little guyslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square215fedilink
minus-squareWordBox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45arrow-down14·5 个月前Source on speeding cameras working for anything other than revenue generation?
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down9·5 个月前If that were the case, they would be hidden. They are a deterrent for speeding most of all.
minus-squareremotedev@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·5 个月前The ones around here, everyone just slows down getting to that intersection, and then picks up speed again after crossing through
minus-squaredriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·5 个月前That’s the main purpose of that cams. Slow drivers on strategic spots that have more chances of accidents.
minus-squareTachyonTele@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 个月前That does make sense. Never thought of it that way.
minus-squareNurgus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·5 个月前In the UK (Where the op picture is) the police cannot collect the revenue from cameras and other fines. It all goes to the gov so the cops have zero financial incentive to install speed cameras.
minus-squareNurgus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 个月前Yes but they get the same amount regardless of the fines. The police see no direct financial connection.
minus-squareLaLuzDelSol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·5 个月前https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20927736/
minus-squareEvotech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·5 个月前https://www.cochrane.org/CD004607/INJ_do-speed-cameras-reduce-road-traffic-crashes-injuries-and-deaths
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·5 个月前More crashes and deaths means less cars and people. Double win for the environment. Environmentalists should be encouraging speeding and drink driving.
minus-square Morphit @feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 个月前You know the person who had the greatest positive impact on the environment on this planet? Genghis Khan, because he massacred forty million people.
minus-squarePrehensile_cloaca @lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 个月前Leans into the window You think y’all can get this thing home?
minus-squareN-E-N@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 个月前https://www.heraldnet.com/news/after-traffic-cameras-went-in-everett-saw-70-decrease-in-speeding/
Source on speeding cameras working for anything other than revenue generation?
If that were the case, they would be hidden.
They are a deterrent for speeding most of all.
The ones around here, everyone just slows down getting to that intersection, and then picks up speed again after crossing through
That’s the main purpose of that cams. Slow drivers on strategic spots that have more chances of accidents.
That does make sense. Never thought of it that way.
In the UK (Where the op picture is) the police cannot collect the revenue from cameras and other fines. It all goes to the gov so the cops have zero financial incentive to install speed cameras.
deleted by creator
Yes but they get the same amount regardless of the fines. The police see no direct financial connection.
deleted by creator
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20927736/
https://www.cochrane.org/CD004607/INJ_do-speed-cameras-reduce-road-traffic-crashes-injuries-and-deaths
More crashes and deaths means less cars and people.
Double win for the environment.
Environmentalists should be encouraging speeding and drink driving.
You know the person who had the greatest positive impact on the environment on this planet? Genghis Khan, because he massacred forty million people.
I have a treat for you
Leans into the window
You think y’all can get this thing home?
https://www.heraldnet.com/news/after-traffic-cameras-went-in-everett-saw-70-decrease-in-speeding/