The Harris-Walz campaign has said they want to create a federal ban on corporate price gouging (usually mentioned when folks talk about price hikes in grocery stores). I see economists complaining about variations of this policy being bad, e.g. leading to food desserts. But as far as I can tell there hasn’t been anything specific proposed. Could someone explain our best guess at what they are proposing, and if it’s been serious analyzed/tested elsewhere?

They cite existing legislation in the states; maybe explaining what that legislation does/how it works would be helpful?

  • ryathal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Kroger and Albertsons don’t actually compete in any markets in the US, that takes collusion.

    • spizzat2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      How do you define “compete”?

      Here they are on opposite corners of the same intersection.

      Sure, that’s only one example, but I’m not sure how well I can Google “Kroger near an [Albertsons|Randalls|Safeway]” to find a list.

      • ryathal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        There are about 600 stores they want to divest where there was actual competition between them. The two control about 5000 stores between them.