• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Those look better made than many roads today.

    Imagine being one of the poor guys who had to carve the inscriptions on those mile blocks during any of the periods where Rome quickly cycled through emperors.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      The inscriptions were given the name of the Emperor to designate which year it was built or commissioned in - Romans didn’t use any sensible system regularly, like numbering the years from a set date. So, luckily for the stone carvers, the Emperor’s name didn’t ever need to be replaced.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Oh, I thought it was so that people who had been away would know if there was a new emperor lol. Better for history since it’s a clear record of what emperors ordered what roads built. Know what portion of them survived to modern times?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Not sure. In places they were built over in the modern day, or repaired with modern techniques before “historical preservation” became a big thing, but there are a hell of a lot of them that still avoided those fates. Still-usable (for foot traffic) Roman roads positively litter Europe, even in Britain, which was the edge of the Empire. Thousands and thousands of miles’ worth.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        So, luckily for the stone carvers, the Emperor’s name didn’t ever need to be replaced.

        Removed, occasionally, but not replaced