CodyIT@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 9 hours agoOOP is not that badosa1.netexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down13
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkOOP is not that badosa1.netCodyIT@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 9 hours agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-29 hours agoI love working in OOP. It’s true that it’s not always the best solution for every project, but damn if it isn’t nice when it is.
minus-squareHawk@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·8 hours agoI’ve always had an easier time jumping into an oop code base, then eg a lisp one. I hear people when they say they don’t want their data mixed in with their logic but The pressure to structure code Is very nice.
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour ago The pressure to structure code Is very nice. That is a great point. It’s interesting how our tools influence our designs, and OOP does force some thought to go into having an intentional structure.
I love working in OOP. It’s true that it’s not always the best solution for every project, but damn if it isn’t nice when it is.
I’ve always had an easier time jumping into an oop code base, then eg a lisp one.
I hear people when they say they don’t want their data mixed in with their logic but The pressure to structure code Is very nice.
That is a great point. It’s interesting how our tools influence our designs, and OOP does force some thought to go into having an intentional structure.