- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
I’ve said it before, they should use Trump’s time to explain why his previous answers to the same questions were lies.
Looks like it’s time to bring this meme out again.
To be fair, he was calling for more debates when he was running against Biden, who was … ineffective.
the power move would be if she goes to Faux News
She accepted the Fox News debate, he declined.
Having a conversation where one party promises to always act in bad faith is a bad move.
More like the stupid move
It’s worked for Pete. Well spoken people can break through the bullshit, but it takes someone special. I’m not sure if Harris has that, but I think she may.
Sounds fun. Lets ask her about genocide.
The problem you have here is that it’s simply not an important issue for most people that are likely to vote in this election. It’s not even in the top ten most important issues for the overwhelming majority of people. Harping on this issue does nothing to help, won’t change the core position, and is likely to end up harming the cause of stopping genocide.
“Soft on terrorism” is a good way to lose a fairly large chunk of voters (because the Oct. 7 attack was terrorism, no matter how you want to justify it). “Opposing genocide” only attracts a very, very small number of voters that wouldn’t have already been voting Democratic.
Is this shitty? Sure. Welcome to the worst nightmare of all: reality.
Why don’t you do that after the election, sport.
