• MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember searching stack overflow for a oddly specific issue and found a post about it with an answer. The person who asked the question was me 6 years ago.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      The person who asked the question was me 6 years ago.

      I have a numbered account on S-O because I couldn’t be arsed to make an account. Almost every month I’ll try to upvote a response and find out it’s my own. I don’t remember writing the response and I only vaguely remember seeing the issue it’s solving.

      I’m convinced future-me is going back in time and writing these but - so far - I never come to my own dinner invite for myself; and knowing I don’t, I know I shouldn’t.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        I saw something a while back an about posting the wrong answer intentionally so a certain subset would not be able to resist providing a “correction”.

        • Boozilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Some call this Cunningham’s Law. It is remarkable how people will ignore a question, but trip over themselves to correct someone. Pedants are going to be pedantic (but may have a useful answer occasionally).

          The developers where I work sometimes use this trick on our users. When they can’t get a response from the users on a request for design input or feedback on something (which happens a lot) the devs will sometimes release some piece of garbage looking thing, and then the users will very quickly put in support cases with the requested info telling them the missing stuff, etc.

          Human nature is why we can’t have nice things.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I find the answer first.

        At least some pedant like me won’t need to come along after and fix the writing; so thanks !

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Better than spending a day writing the script, only to discover that you’d already written a better one as soon as you’re done.

    First day at Antimemetics and I’m already wasting my own time.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s almost as bad as spending time upgrading a script only to find out you already updated it and forgot you gave it a stupid name.

      Thank the gods for content searching vs file name searching. Only way I can find stuff some day.

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t want an AI shitting up my nice, clean, best-practice following bash.

      EDIT: Sorry for this comment. I really need to deal with my anger towards AI. The sentiment expressed is what I think, but I’m not happy with the aggressive and dismissive way I communicated.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        All you do is give it the existing code and say ‘unhardcode these values’. People are unreasonably fearful of new tools.

      • felsiq@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If I could give your edit an upvote separately from the main post, I would - congrats on the emotional maturity! /gen

      • _____@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s hard to notice AI shitting up your code when you’re terrible at coding in the first place and think suggesting AI is a perfectly good choice.