Google’s AI may replace traditional websites and content creators leading to potential monopolization and diminishing user experience - Mrwhosetheboss

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I miss old mrwhosetheboss who was more technically knowledgeable. He was talking about android modifications like roms that he probably would never talk about today.

  • sheogorath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’ve been experiencing this, but only when I’m not logged in to my Google account. It seems that they’re forcing people to log in so that the search results are less shitty.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Can anyone confirm this? Sounds like something exactly they would do for better data farming. All corps over last few years are offensive with browser tracking bullshit.

      At this rate will demand a camera in your toilet to authenticate you every time you shit to ensure proper ad sense “fingerprint”

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Google: “Well surely, he couldn’t tank TWO massive social media engines in one lifetime!”

      • gravitas_deficiency
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Granted I’m jaded as fuck from only a decade and a half as a software engineer, but from where I’m standing, it’s pretty much all just c-suite circlejerking. Competent, incisive, effective, and ethical c-suite leadership that doesn’t focus primarily on finance matters is vanishingly rare these days.

        • moseschrute@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I’m also a software engineer, but much earlier in my career and mostly having worked at small startups. But I hope some of the tech giants fall and make way for smaller players and innovation. But maybe that’s too optimistic.

          • gravitas_deficiency
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            I’ve got the same hope, buddy. It’s engineering; we solve problems. We just need to figure out how to unshackle ourselves from the hypercapitalists. Hopefully we can sort that out soon.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    For the same reason it became more popular than other search engines in 00s. Those would give honest search results, Google would have various kinds of complex foolery approaching ML to give people what they wanted quicker.

    One can say their corporate culture shows signs of overfitting for that situation. And not just theirs. In general those attempts to make products more competitive with even more complex foolery outside of the main functionality - are that.

    Except when products are simply less usable for said main functionality, people use them less even if they don’t consciously realize that.

    Also - what is Google in essence? It’s saying that some computing thing is too smart for you to run it at home or self-host it. It can only be done by the very smart and important people in companies with trillions in capitalization. And because you can’t, you are by some cultural taboo forbidden, to run it at home or self-host it, they get to manipulate results to make you give money to the people partnering with them.

    We all know there’s nothing fundamentally or practically impossible in making a search engine. If we don’t have to cache pages, it’s actually easy.

    The issue is in the service requirements. What the Internet needs is a technically transparent p2p market of services. Where storage and computing power can be transparently donated (or sold) just like in some countries you can sell power to the electric grid.

    OK, I’ve described the magic wand. That’s the strategy. Tactics is for someone actually capable of conceiving the thing. LOL

    • cybergazer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      When you go to search something and you literally have to type site:reddit.com at the end of it to get a human response it’s no wonder it’s falling apart

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        And reddit is locking shit up as we speak. These corpos about stole 30 years of the internet from us. There is not much recourse either they control pretty much all of the IP and infrastructure. So their way or highway.

        Well there is fediverse for social media at least but it will long time to scale. Other sub sectors will probably need to explore similar models if people want to get away from being gang by 2-3 oligopolies in every market/service they need.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The search engine magic isn’t just about caching pages. It’s also extremely expensive / complex to:

      • maintain an index of all the websites in the world. This is an extremely high cost
      • refresh that index in almost real time. How long will your self hosted crawler take to find new content for every website in the world?
      • there’s also the algorithm for weighing results. The order of results and their relevance is not easy at all. How many times a word appears on a page is a terrible metric.

      A hosted search is also a lot more environmentally friendly - that gigantic search index and all the energy poured into the work is something that can be shared by everyone. If everyone did that themselves at home, you spend that same amount of energy for every single household.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        “Almost real time” is not what I’d call necessary.

        Weighting results - I’d expect user feedback (good result, bad result, combined with keywords from the request) would be good enough. Similar to ed2k for files’ reputation.

        The index is going to be big, yes. But if we want a p2p system with split storage and computation, something between Freenet and Ceph, may be doable.

        A hosted search is also a lot more environmentally friendly - that gigantic search index and all the energy poured into the work is something that can be shared by everyone. If everyone did that themselves at home, you spend that same amount of energy for every single household.

        With some kind of such a p2p system I can imagine the overhead to be like 10 or maybe 100 times Google. But not what you said.

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve started getting those AI responses from Google now and I honestly skip right past them.

    I fundamentally don’t trust the information so what’s the point of even reading it?

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The AI responses are so incredibly bad.

      I searched for a video game walkthrough that has a similar name to a movie, and it GAVE ME THE MOVIE PLOT.

      What a shit show.

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, but in my experience other search engines still give slightly worse results.

        Kagi seemed good, but don’t wanna pay for it. Or at least not as much as they’re charging.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Startpage gives you the same google results, minus the AI responses.

        • rfr_Foglia@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve been using Brave Search in the past few months and i can’t notice any difference in quality from Google in regular search.

          The only difference I can’t notice is the quality in image searches.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most of this AI stuff is trash. I think Google AI has maybe once given me a useful answer. Amazon has this thing called Rufus that just slows down the process of searching customer reviews. Just like Google, it’s maybe once or twice given me useful information and none of it worth the wait that it takes for the search results to come up.

      But we are pouring billions into it and increasing our data center power usage by 10x because It’s The Future …

      • copd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The problem is AI will always confidently give you an answer like its word is fact. Obviously since you’re the one searching, you’re most likely unable to verify its accuracy so it’s impossible to trust.

        I dont mind AI being wrong when i can immediately tell when its wrong but in searches I’ll never trust it

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That’s a very good point. Things like chat GPT can accelerate the process of doing something that takes time but a human knows when it’s done correctly. But in anything where finding truth is the goal, it shouldn’t be trusted yet.

  • Flipper@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe because the person that ran yahoo search into the ground is now responsible for Google search.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So you posted a 17 minute video instead of a five-word sentence

        Link an article next time please!

          • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            It still contains about one minute’s worth of info in a 17 minute video though

            • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              If something is engaging, interesting, and entertaining, then it is far more likely to stick in your mind or teach you something new than a single sentence. This 17-minute video may do more to raise awareness of google search’s enshitification than any single sentence or minutes worth of info would ever have.

              I dont disagree with you, but i dont think it matters. The video will help people.

  • EuCaue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sometimes I forget that google is a searching engine, I’ve been using DDG for years now! :)

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I can’t say I’m liking DDG. The first page gives me the same domain links. Like when I search for “eye washing gifs”, the first three links is the same website. Where I’d expect it to give me three separate websites (and combine searches).

      It does that for a few searches.

      But then again, I’m not even liking Google.

      • spiderman@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        have you tried searchpage or searxng? i think they use google (while searxng also use other search engines) beyond the scenes.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’ve been dogfooding Searxng for a week or so now and I’m sold on it over DDG and certainly over Google. Besides good results out of the box and being selfhosted so I have some search privacy (sorta), you can tune it to get better results for your particular situation.

          Setup was a quick docker compose and env file, and then add it to FF with a rightclick on the URL bar to set it up in my search engines.

          • spiderman@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            i am using a public instance right now, might host one in the future. its just been two days since i started using it and i am still trying to get accustomed to it.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      The best thing about ddg is that I can click on any of the result links.

      In google I have to skip like the first 3 rows because they are all tracking ads and my pihole blocks them 😁

  • Imhotep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just received a Kagi invite from a friend.

    It’s absolutely great

    Let’s hope they don’t look too closely at how family plans are shared for now.
    10€ + taxes a month is just too steep for me