• mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    There was a lot of extra fire at the end, but it looked amazing.

    It’s going both way slower than expected, but progress is also super rapid. This is exactly what they needed to get going with the Artemis moon landing. Without this catch they’d never be able to refuel cost effectively.

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      It looks like some small pieces blew off the booster and there was a little fire at the end, but they recovered it and can work on solving that for the next flight. What a catch.

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wonder how much they’ll be able to learn through thoroughly inspecting the flown hardware. That’s not a luxury they’ve had up until now. I would imagine it’s way easier to figure out exactly how minor issues manifested when they can go through the booster with a fine toothed comb.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Elon said they’ve done an initial inspection and it’s looking great. Also already found some stuff to improve that they’d never know without the catch

          A few outer engine nozzles are warped from heating & some other minor issues, but these are easily addressed.

          • threelonmusketeers
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m eager to see how they’ll address the nozzle warping. I wonder if they would do a short reentry burn after all, or whether changes to the flight profile or engine shielding would be sufficient.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              With the changes in raptor 3 getting rid of the heat shields I’m wondering what this means as well. It warped with a heat shield. Prior to this, they didn’t think raptor 3 needed one, but does this change things?

        • Synapse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          They won’t have this chance with the starship, although they tried. The splash-down seamed relatively smooth, but the starship exploded soon after.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can you imagine going back to the Apollo era and showing them this video and going just land it on the launch pad again. Obvious really.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Watching it was incredible, however not surprising. This is just an evolution of what SpaceX has gotten good at. They’re “just” changed the point where it stops, with less stress on the rocket and less parts to fail (the landing gear). I know there’s a lot of complexity behind it working, this isn’t downplaying the effort. It’s applauding how they’re slowly making reusable rockets common.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The thing is they’re the only people working on reusable rockets even NASA have given up with the idea (after barely even trying).

      So every milestone increases the likelihood that will get more reusable rockets now that they’ve proven the concept in sound.