Google is weakening ad blockers as part of their MV3 extension standard and this will trickle down into all Chromium browsers. Built in ad blockers lack features compared to uBlock Origin as well.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Mozilla is mostly funded by google. With the current cookie laws from the eu to try and stop user tracking, they developed a new solution together.

      Both chrome and firefox analyze your behaviour on your pc/phone/device. Then instead of giving websites the right ads, your browser tells every website you visit (with such ads) about you. You can google “privacy sandbox” if you’d like to know more.

      So you better not be gay in a place like iraq, and be in need of using your school’s website on a personal computer.

    • babybus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Mozilla is now focusing on the advertising business.

      • BonerMan@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        To reduce reliance on Google… With the goal to change how advertising works, less annoying, less asshole ads would benefit everyone.

        • babybus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s not my browser’s job to report to advertisers, period.

          • BonerMan@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            Its not doing that, you can use a fork if you want, or, and that would be the important part, put a condom over your internet cable before it enters the router, safety first.

              • dan@upvote.au
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                The data doesn’t go to the advertiser - it’s anonymized, encrypted, and sent to an aggregation service. The data isn’t about you personally.

                This is a much better solution than what’s used for advertising today.

                • Cypher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Where’s it go after aggregation? To advertisers.

                  I don’t care if it is better than the creepy shit advertisers do today because it doesn’t stop advertisers from continuing to do creepy shit.

                  All it does it give advertisers MORE data. It isn’t a replacement it is an addition.

                  • dan@upvote.au
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    The advertiser doesn’t get your data directly. The data is aggregated using differential privacy so it’s impossible for them to see any individual’s data.

              • BonerMan@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Good luck using the internet without having that data harvested by waaaaaay worse people. Again, just opt out.

            • babybus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why are you talking about things you don’t fully understand?