lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 个月前I'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down130
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageI'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.orglousyd@lemmy.sdf.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 个月前message-square138fedilink
minus-squareGingaNinga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 个月前technically viruses aren’t alive. They just use cellular machinery to replicate and thats it.
minus-squareNurse_Robot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-24 个月前Eh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
minus-squareGingaNinga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 个月前Thats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.
technically viruses aren’t alive. They just use cellular machinery to replicate and thats it.
Eh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language
Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
Thats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.