The Labour government has published details of badger culling licenses that could result in the targeting of almost 40,000 additional badgers in 2024. These culls, across the High-Risk bovine TB area in England, will be in addition to the 230,000 that have been killed since licensed culling was introduced in 2013.
The licenses cover 20 ‘intensive cull zones’, which are on their third or fourth year of intensive culling, plus 26 ‘supplementary licenses’ extending the culls in zones which have completed four years of intensive culling. Badger populations in some of these latter zones are now being targeted for the ninth consecutive year, while other zones have been issued supplementary licenses for the first time.
The government has also published licenses for two new cull zones in the Low-Risk TB area in England, one in Lincolnshire and one in Cumbria, but has not released figures detailing how many badgers can be targeted.
Is there any peer reviewed published research that studied if this was effective and the best available option. This sounds like the Namibians clubbing baby seals because they eat their fish supply.
Is there any peer reviewed published research that studied if this was effective and the best available option.
Recently, this study found that although culling does reduce cattle infection in the immediate area, it seems to increase infection in surrounding areas - due to displaced badgers spreading it - which is exactly what everyone opposing the culls predicted way back when they started.
There’s also a humane alternative that we know does work - catching and vaccinating badgers https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/aug/06/badger-vaccination-cull-eradicate-bovine-tuberculosis-btb-farmers-cornwall-study-zsl-aoe
I would be up for volunteer work vaccinating badgers.
There is also a vaccine for cattle but DEFRA won’t approve its use in this country.
the 230,000 that have been killed since licensed culling was introduced in 2013
That’s an absolute shit ton of animals. Imagine the infrastructure, human resources, costs, energy use, all that. We’re not talking about catch-and-release of a few hundred acres here.
Call 'em 30lbs. each, close enough. The 40,000 they intend to cull this year adds up to 1,200,000 pounds of live, angry animal. Quite a chore!
Humans are part of nature too and there are species for which humans have been their main predator for thousands of years and that makes humans the predator required to keep a balance in their population, seals and deers (no matter how cute they are) being two examples in Canada.
Anticosti island shows what happens without any population control, deers had to start eating coniferous trees and you can have tens of thousands dying of sickness or starvation in a single year.
What you are saying is technically true. Humans are keeping numbers of animals down by culling them. But humans are also keeping numbers of animals up to make money from them. There would be no bovine TB if people weren’t breeding millions of cows, keeping them in confined spaces and transporting them all over the place.
Sure, that’s a separate debate though, I’m just saying that what’s happening with badgers and Namibian seals might actually be necessary.
Like I keep saying: this continues to be about avoiding the root cause of bovine TB, which is factory farming.
