David Miller was unfairly dismissed by the University of Bristol over beliefs about Israel that are protected under UK anti-discrimination law, tribunal finds
  • rammer@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    18·
    10 hours ago

    Anti-zionist does not equal anti-semitic. Just as being anti-nazi does not mean you are anti-white.

    It is amazing how many people understand the second one but not the first one.

  • Dasus@lemmy.worldEnglish
    63·
    9 hours ago

    Could you fucking stop spamming this garbage propaganda?

    Everyone except the filthy Zionists knew that Pro-Palestinian rhetoric is covered by the freedom of speech.

    Essentially this article is Zionists complaining that “we have to respect other people? But mooom I don’t want to”

    Fuck off and breathe in a a cactus

    • gmtom@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      8 hours ago

      Everyone except the filthy Zionists knew that Pro-Palestinian rhetoric is covered by the freedom of speech.

      1. Pro palestine and anti-zionism are different concepts

      2. This is the UK where we don’t have a fetishised version of free speech

      • Dasus@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        3 hours ago

        Pro palestine and anti-zionism are different concepts

        My point exactly. This was Pro-Palestinian rhetoric, which is now being painted as Anti-Zionist rhetoric, for obvious reasons.

        From the article:

        An employment tribunal in the UK has concluded that holding the belief that Israel’s actions against Palestinians amount to apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide are “worthy of respect in a democratic society”.

        That’s Pro-Palestinian beliefs.

        This is the UK where we don’t have a fetishised version of free speech

        I’m Finnish, not American.

    • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      3·
      9 hours ago

      It is also worded in such a way as to compare it to the Forstater judgement because Kath Viner has to work in transphobia to every part of the Guardian