• Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      55
      ·
      1 month ago

      But I didn’t want Clinton to win. My picks were: 1. Lessig, 2. Sanders, 3. Stein, 4. Johnson (Gary), 5. blank. Knowing only what I knew in 2016, I disliked Trump and Clinton equally, and would never have voted for either one.

      (And yes, I did know that Sanders had endorsed Clinton.)

      • Mouselemming
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would hope that you learned something from your error, but this comment shows clearly you haven’t. I learned it when I voted for John Anderson and in my tiny way contributed to Reagan winning: in America, you vote to keep the worst fascist out of power, and if it means voting for someone who isn’t perfect but has the numbers to do it, that’s who you vote for. The primary may be your opportunity to show support for other parties, and you can go to rallies and spread the good word to influence the discussion, but until the day your third party candidate has enough potential votes to actually win it, you help hold the wall.

        • Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Shit, I wouldn’t even discount trying to vote 3rd party when it comes to local elections or state elections. You have to chip away at the power the big parties have at the peripheries first, before trying to do big stuff like voting 3rd party in the big presidential election where they are basically guaranteed to not win.

          • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah but saying that you vote third party during local elections doesn’t rile people up. Many of these third party voters only come out of the woodwork during presidential elections just because they want to be contrarians.

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        We wouldn’t have a 6-3 conservative supreme court with Clinton, along with a rash of conservative lower courts. Not only have we had extreme fallout from this already. But it will be affecting us for decades.

        A bunch of our red states likely wouldn’t have swung to extremism, like my home state which went from Asa Hutchinson to Sarah Huckabee-Sanders. I don’t know if my kids will legally be allowed to learn that slavery existed in school.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          1 month ago

          We would absolutely have a 6-3 conservative court with Clinton. We just wouldn’t call it conservative.

          We probably wouldn’t have a fascist court like we do now though.