cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21049862

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would “fourteen whatevers” ever be preferable to “14 whatevers”. It’s just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like “273 billion”).

  • Classy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wtf I’ve never heard of this, what a cursed way to notate large numbers

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s not cursed, it’s just a different way of grouping. Nothing about grouping in multiples of 10³ is a more natural grouping, were just more used to it.

      And I’m pointing out how metric prefixes are actually euro-centric, and that’s annoying for them. But there’s nothing fundamentally worse about breaking digits in groups of 4, rather than 3

      1,000,000,000,000 = 1,0000,0000,0000 (1012) [Meme of black and white muscular arms embracing.]

      Look up the indian system, now that’s actually cursed.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_numbering_system