• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Sorry, I can’t. Studies are ongoing, the most recent artcle I can find says that the first 120 days of the conflict alone were greater than the annual emissions of 26 individual countries and territories. When factoring in war infrastructure built by both Israel and Hamas, the total emissions increase to more than those of 36 countries and territories.

    Again, that’s just from the first 120 days. I’m sure I can’t just multiply by three to get the past year, and the data isn’t available.

    Also that doesn’t even factor in the carbon emissions that will come from rebuilding all of Gaza, because the whole strip is demolished.

    And it doesn’t factor in Israel dragging us to WW3. What do you think the climate impacts of that will be?

    I can’t accept that this is the best we can do.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      No one said it was the best we can do.

      I’m guessing you have heard the phrase, “don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.” That’s what you’re doing. You’re not going to get your pony.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I only said we should demand more and highlighted the Biden-Harris administration’s fucked up priorities. I’m not asking for a pony, I’m asking that we stop burning fossil fuels to support a genocidal apartheid state. It’s not an unreasonable expectation!

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nope. That is not what you only said.

          You also said this:

          It won’t improve anything. Any progress that could be made will be undone by the massive carbon emissions from war. At best it might slow climate change slightly.

          My guess is you said it because you either do not understand or do not accept the concept of mitigation and why mitigation is a good thing.

          And slowing climate change gives us more time to fight it.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            I stand by that. Mitigation doesn’t improve anything, it only makes things bad at a slower rate. Nothing actually gets better.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Are you under the strange impression that it’s just as easy to improve things whether or not harm is being mitigated?

              Because I’m pretty sure it’s easier when it is.

              Which is why this will improve things. No, not on its own. Nothing is ever improved on its own when it comes to complex systems. You are reducing one of the most complex systems we know about, climate, to simple black-and-white terms.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I’m under the impression that it would be a lot easier to improve things if the billions spent supporting Israel were instead spent on climate change mitigation. That’s not black-and-white, but it’s a clear conflict between the administration’s words and their actions.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yes, again, letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Very few people here want the money spent on Israel.

                  That doesn’t mean acting like everything else that the Biden administration does is worthless because of it. It is possible to have massive criticisms of a political administration and acknowledge when they do something good.

                  Domestic clean energy manufacturing is a good thing. Bringing jobs to former coal communities that are depressed communities due to the coal no longer being mined is a good thing. Climate mitigation is a good thing. This helps with all of those things.

                  Pretending everything is awful because one thing is awful achieves nothing. Neither does making every Biden or Harris thread into a complaint about the U.S. aiding Israel. Who exactly do you think you’re going to convince here? How does this constant complaining help Palestinians?

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    My only point was to highlight how the Biden administration has it’s priorities backwards i.e. millions for climate, billions for Israel.

                    I’m venting frustration. That’s all the internet is good for anyway. Complaining doesn’t matter, your arguing doesn’t matter, nothing we post matters.