I’ve been reading that BlueSky has reached critical mass and is snowballing well at the moment. I suspect it has drawn people away from the fedi and back into the loving embrace of venture capitalists.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Once in a blue moon I remember that I have a Mastodon account. And I use it mostly because of the cross-compatibility with other Fediverse applications, something that Bluesky lacks.

    I suspect it has drawn people away from the fedi and back into the loving embrace of venture capitalists.

    I think so, too. Even people who understand what federation is and why it’s good are still affected by network effect; “it’s federated” might weight a lot for them, but it is not a perfect shield.

    • vaguerant@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Even though there is some network effect just in terms of there being much less content on the threadiverse than Reddit, I do feel like this is something we’re somewhat shielded from. For the most part, we’re not here to follow specific people: my friends aren’t on Lemmy/Mbin, or maybe they are, I don’t actually know or care. I have a Mastodon, but a lot of the people I’d theoretically be interested to follow are still on Twitter, or BlueSky, or Threads or something. It’s not enough of a pull factor to make me join any of those, but it’s probably why I barely use Mastodon.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Instead of “shielded” I think that a more accurate word would be that we have a “buffer”. The network effect still applies to us, as much as it does in the microblogging side of the Fediverse; it’s just indirectly (more people → more content → more people), in a way that content produced here in the past still might attract users in the future.