• Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If 90% of the population call them seagulls, and 99% of the population understand what you mean when you say “seagull”, then yes, they are actually called seagulls

    • brown567
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s like what I say to bother botanists:

      If half of the fruits with “berry” in their name don’t fit your definition of berry, you need a new definition

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Annoy naturalists with these other animal names too: Jellyfish, crawfish, starfish, Killer Whale, Canadian Geese, and American Buffalo.

      • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If you’re an ornithologist writing a scientific paper, you’d presumably be using a genus + species in Latin rather than any colloquial name anyway, while still acknowledging that they fall under the umbrella term “seagull” for most people. But I’m a descriptive linguist, rather than prescriptive, and that’s really what this meme is about (it’s not about seagulls)

        • IMongoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Birds actually have scientific common names and it’s completely acceptable to refer to them with those names. They even have standardized bird abbreviations using those names, like Red-tailed Hawk is RTHA. They of course use the latin names too, and those have their own abbreviations (Buteo jamaicensis is BUTJAM) but the common names are handier.

        • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I enjoy having semi-serious discussions about nonsense like this, so I appreciate RubberElectron’s reply calling me out