• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In total, there were 118 false positives — a rate of 4.29%.

    Earlier this year, investors filed a class-action lawsuit, accusing company executives of overstating the devices’ capabilities and claiming that “Evolv does not reliably detect knives or guns.”

    I mean, in terms of performance, I’d be more concerned about the false positive rate than the false negative rate, given the context. Like, if you miss a gun, whatever. That’s at worst just the status quo, which has been working. Some money gets wasted on the machine. But if you are incorrectly stopping more than 1 in 25 New Yorkers from getting on their train, and apply that to all subway riders, that sounds like a monumental mess.

    • jettrscga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      1 month ago

      With how trigger happy police are, the false positives would lead to more deaths than they prevent. And police would claim it’s justified because the machine told them so.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        30 days ago

        Facial recognition confirmed he was a criminal and the scanner confirmed he had a gun! Of course we opened fire instantly. How could we have known it was just some guy with a water bottle?

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 month ago

    The article links an article from March '24 talking about the introduction of these devices that contains this part:

    The scanner that Adams and police officials introduced during Thursday’s news conference in a lower Manhattan station came from Evolv, a publicly traded company that has been accused of doctoring the results of software testing to make its scanners appear more effective than they are.

    So they could never be trusted but were still allowed to proceed.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      30 days ago

      Look, we can either look at facts and check the claims of that company that we’re going to invest a lot of money into, or we can accept their bribe and move on. It’s all about efficiency.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    I saw a dude jogging up the stairs and his gun fell out of his hoody sweats. He looked at it for a second and the picked it up and put it on his hoody like it was his phone.

    5/7 best subway exit ever.

    • magikmw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      30 days ago

      I know the reference, and I’mma let you finnish, but 5/7, bruh that’s a gucci gun.

  • spyd3r
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Someone should tell NYC that it is unconstitutional to infringe upon a person’s right to bear arms.

    • RedC
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      It’s funny that it’s all about states right to form their own laws until it’s about guns.

      • BD89@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        To be fair, I don’t think a state is supposed to make laws that take away constitutional rights though. It’d be like a state making a law taking away your freedom of speech, I don’t think that’s supposed to be allowed with state rights and all