The Illinois Supreme Court found the state’s assault weapons ban constitutional. It was passed after the Highland Park shooting last year.

  • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The 2nd Amendment also says “well-regulated,” but folks sure seem to forget about that bit, huh.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s only been in the last 50 years or so that people considered that phrase meaningless. It used to mean exactly what it said. Thank the NRA for being a industry-pushing, Russia-money-taking scumbag.

      • Tb0n3
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The militia is every able bodied man in the country. That was the definition at the time. And being that a well armed populace is important to the freedom of the nation we shall not infringe on their rights to keep and bare arms.

        That’s the actual modern day translation for you. It’s not “exact” because just using colloquial phrasing, but the meaning should be clear.

        • QHC@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting. We have the National Guard now to fill the role of militia, which we know because it was created by the Militia Act. Pretty clear intent on that one.

          Using the definition at the time, it appears that there’s actually not a right for any random person to have a gun. If you want one, join the well-regulated militia.

          • Tb0n3
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            According to that militia act one half is still basically everyone. Also the militia isn’t guaranteed the right but the people. The comma is there for a reason.

            Unorganized militia – comprising the reserve militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, National Guard, or Naval Militia.

        • bedrooms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you share a source? I’m very surprised to hear that they specified well-regulated militia when they just meant basically everyone.

          • Tb0n3
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The militia act as mentioned by somebody else is a modern redefining and still includes the definition of basically every man. To be clear, the well regulated militia is merely a reason for the people (everyone) to keep and bear arms. Not the qualifier of who should be allowed.

            Unorganized militia – comprising the reserve militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, National Guard, or Naval Militia.

    • mister_monster@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You don’t even know what that means. It means “regularized”, as in well trained and supplied. The idea was that having the populace be well armed would make it easier to muster a defense force in case of a conflict. “Because the state needs a well supplied and trained military force to remain free, the people have the right to own and carry armaments without restriction” would be the correct transliteration using the vocabulary of today.

      • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have a standing army now, so yeah. About that. It’s an outdated amendment that only recently has been interpreted as zero restrictions.

        • mister_monster@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was interpreted as having 0 restrictions for 150 years.

          You might find it outdated and useless, repeal it then.

          • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You do not know what you are talking about, or the laws around it and the interpretations of it changed in the 80s.

            I will not argue with y’all gun weirdos. Have a lovely day.