• saddlebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably more like “I’m backing your bitch trump. When (pls god no) he wins, I’ll give you access to space tech and you can crush Ukraine. Please Senpai notice me” <lapping noises> <Elon smells putins dirty asshole>

    • threelonmusketeersOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      and nationalise SpaceX

      Let’s hope not. Nationalizing SpaceX would hamper their longterm projects beyond the Moon.

    • ptfrd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      If so, why would SpaceX have so rapidly & aggressively moved to restore Ukraine’s communications capabilities in the early days and weeks of the current war, and maintained them ever since?

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        Likely the US government said to do so or else they can kiss their funding and licenses goodbye.

        • ptfrd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Plausible. It’s not how I imagine them engaging with their defence contractors but I don’t actually have a clue how it works. One supporting point might be if there were any other companies treated similarly, like if Lockheed Martin was ordered to immediately ramp up production of relevant types of military hardware, and told that the details (contracts / payment / etc.) would be sorted out later.

          An opposing point would be the fact that the US and its allies knew an invasion was likely well in advance. Yet the initial Starlink ‘roll out’ seemed pretty ad hoc, with SpaceX organizing its own logistics. But then maybe the allies didn’t expect Russia to be so effective in disrupting the existing military comms infrastructure.

      • lemming
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Based on some old tweets, I think Musk believes Putin wants to use nuclear weapons. Then, the army put some pressure on him to keep supporting Ukraine, but he is still also working on his own. I’m sure he could block the Starlink terminals Russian army is using, if he wanted to try, for example.

        • ptfrd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m sure he could block the Starlink terminals Russian army is using, if he wanted to try, for example.

          I remember a story coming out about Russians using Starlink but it seemed a bit vague to me. Has anyone reliable actually asserted that SpaceX are significantly underperforming in the job of blocking captured terminals (once notified), or other aspects of the day-to-day operations that the Ukrainians would do if they controlled it themselves?

          • lemming
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I actually don’t know. I didn’t dig into it, I just read an article about Russians praising Starlink bought through third parties used at the front. It seemed similar enough to other captured communications previously shown as accurate. But it doesn’t definitively prove anything for sure. It could’ve easily been propaganda from any involved party.

            • ptfrd
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Just saw this https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1849956344691912873

              … As has been repeatedly confirmed by the Department of Defense, SpaceX has worked (and continues to work) in close partnership with the U.S. Government regarding Ukraine and denial of service to bad actors. …

            • ptfrd
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah. One possibility is that SpaceX were indeed underperforming, and the story was placed to put public pressure on them to improve. (A bit like the 2019-09-27 Bridenstine tweet.)

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So… he coordinates with Putin, yet supplies internet to the Ukranian military via an arrangement with the U.S. military.

    Explain how Elon is not an international security threat. How do we remove this cancerous cyst?

    • ptfrd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      How do we remove this cancerous cyst?

      I think your username gives us a clue what you would do to Musk and others if you ever gained any power.

      I would entrust the wellbeing of humanity to him, over you, without hesitation. We had enough of your type in the 20th Century, thanks.

      • ptfrd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        (And just to be clear, I have many problems and potential concerns about Musk. I’m just saying I’d choose him over, say, a Maoist, or a Stalinist, and over “Burn_The_Right”.)

  • ptfrd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This would be a nuclear option and, in reality, probably would do more harm than good to SpaceX,

    It would probably set back their more ambitious targets by decades. But even Starship is now far enough along to no longer really need Musk’s stewardship, and the US government would be happy enough just with control of the Falcon programme. They don’t care much / at all about Making Life Multi-Planetary.

    So I consider a move like this pretty plausible.

    • lemming
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t, Musk is too influential. And honestly, I don’t think there needs to be much concern about space launch part of the business. I’m under the impression that it is already regulated enough to be relatively safely under control. And I would be sad to see it taken away from SpaceX and probably even Musk specifically. He is an incredible idiot and dangerous person, but the progress they did and triggered in others is undeniable and I’d like to see it continue.

      But Starlink is a completely different matter. Private company strongly lead by a single, somewhat crazy person, is very dangerous. I think few people expected it to be such a game changer in the beginning, I certainly didn’t. But it is important and very influential. Maybe ideal would be if it was controlled by the government, if it had the final say in geopolitical decisions etc., but the profits (or some part), development and such remained in the hands of SpaceX. Well, some international body as isolated from political influence as possible would be even better, but there’s no chance of that happening.