• Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This slope is not slippery at all. Denying holocaust has been a crime since 2002 1994 in Germany and yet Germany had no issues with upkeeping free speech in the two three decades since.

    edit: oops it’s actually older than I thought

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      TIL it’s that recent. I know there was at least some anti-Nazi laws from the start.

      The slope gets slippery at some point, though, right? I don’t think it’s a stupid thing to worry about, even if ultimately this is the right choice.

      • Jakeroxs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It gets slippery depending on who is in power, which is exactly what we have to defend against.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Well, any group in power has incentive to abuse it, and I think history shows they always will given the chance (at least in the long run).

          • Jakeroxs
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I agree completely, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”

      • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The slope gets slippery at some point, though, right? I don’t think it’s a stupid thing to worry about

        Sure. I wouldn’t like to see climate change denialism criminalized in this century and I’d be pretty worried if any government pushed for it - but we’re so so far away from something like that happening. We’re way closer to going backwards in reconciliation.

          • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s my point. The far-right of this country is already working to destroy opposition and we’re closer to implementing climate change denialism policies and going backward on reconciliation than we’re close to having free speech at danger. And in any case, it’s not like the precedent doesn’t exist already or that the far-right needs the precedent to grow fascist.

            • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              There is basically one thing that people should prevent fascists from doing, and that is getting hold of the state apparatus. Once the army, police, health, education and social services are under far right control there is no horror we can put past them.