• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Thats the trick ain’t it? This whole thing would fix itself if we would leave everything alone. We won’t.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It’s not about the amount of people when the top 10 own like 40% of everything.

        But yeah, your sentence is still correct; the level of greed just comes from a tiny minority of people.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          It is about the amount of people, at this level of greed. Everyone wants a house in the suburbs.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            No, not everyone does.

            Besides, we could probably utilise a lot of area sustainably to increase suburbs, worldwide, if we didn’t live in this wageslave bullshit where only the top hogs all the money while not giving a fuck about sustainability or employee well being.

      • spidermanchild
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Is inequality actually the problem when it comes to carbon? Just as a thought exercise, if everyone on earth, or even within each county, received an equal share of GDP, I suspect emissions may increase. You’d replace the private jets with more of everything else. Inequality is a major issue for a host of other reasons though, absolutely.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There really needs to be a global fund that every country pays into, that’s dispersed to countries with significant forestation in proportion to their contribution. If money is the barrier to climate action, we need to make it the best option economically to maintain forests and other similar areas.

    • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Thing is, it is possible to make it profitable. Trees fixating carbon produce wood. Cut trees, sell wood. New wood grows. Repeat. The more wood we use in construction, furniture, paper, the more carbon is removed from the atmosphere.