• jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          20 days ago

          I’m guessing people in US allies countries like the UK, even billionaires, realize how bad Trump will be for foreign relations. So while Musk and Besos will suck his dick because all of their shit is in the US, these guys aren’t so eager to play ball.

          • gravitas_deficiency
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Primarily because all the billionaires outside of the US understand that the US leaving NATO (which imo will absolutely happen if Trump managed to gain a hold on power) would basically put them in existential danger from Russian expansionism, and potentially a full blown nuclear exchange + WW3 - because without us backstopping Europe, the Russians very well may be able to straight up saturation-strike most major European military bases, and just steamroll shit.

            Don’t get me wrong - Russia is doing embarrassingly poorly against Ukraine, all things considered. But if the US becomes isolationist, Russia and China will likely take that to mean that it’s open season, and there really aren’t that many world powers outside of India that could credibly stand up to a full on combined onslaught from those two.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          21 days ago

          Not the greatest background but certainly unsurprising for The Economist. Oh well, an endorsement is an endorsement.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    21 days ago
    The Economist - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Economist:

    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom


    Wikipedia search about this source

    The Economist - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Economist:

    Wiki: reliable - Most editors consider The Economist generally reliable. Distinctively, its news articles appear without bylines and are written in editorial voice. Within these articles, Wikipedia editors should use their judgement to discern factual content – which can be generally relied upon – from analytical content, which should be used in accordance with the guideline on opinion in reliable sources. Its pseudonymous commentary columns and other opinion pieces should also be handled according to this guideline.


    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://archive.is/20241031133151/https://www.economist.com/in-brief/2024/10/31/why-the-economist-endorses-kamala-harris
    https://www.economist.com/in-brief/2024/10/31/why-the-economist-endorses-kamala-harris

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 days ago

      My ballot had 3 options: Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and Robert Kennedy, Jr.

      Write-ins are not allowed in Indiana.

      Who should I have voted for?

      • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        19 days ago

        Your choices were 3 flavors of right wing. Who you choose on your ballot is up to you.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          19 days ago

          I’ve been told for months now by people like yourself that no one should vote for Biden and then for Harris.

          Now it’s suddenly “it’s up to you?”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 days ago

                  Okay then, who should Hoosiers vote for? You said no one should vote for Harris.

                  That leaves Trump, Oliver and Kennedy.

                  Which of those three should no one vote for as well? Let’s do a process of elimination here and take it step by step.

                  I assume Kennedy is not an option here since he dropped out already, but he’s still on the ballot. Obviously, that’s essentially not voting and you’re suggesting that not voting is not a good choice.

                  So, that leaves Trump, the Republican and Oliver, the Libertarian.

                  Should no one vote for Trump?

                • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  17 days ago

                  "I will never, ever, EVER explicitly make a claim for a course of action, because then you’ll be able to refute my decision as stupid.

                  Instead I just want to hold my nose in the air over all of you sheeple and criticize and shame you for EVERY action, shaking my head and smirking like some kind of disingenous gaslighting machine. Happy Election Day!"

        • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Congratulations on this important revelation, do you want a cookie?

      • Nythos
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        You can just block .ml at an instance level and you’ll be better off for it and you can add Hexbear in there too.

        • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          I didn’t see what you were responding to, but I’m very close to doing this. Yesterday I unsubbed from just about all the .ml communities I was subbed to. They’re impossible to talk to and have gotten incredibly nasty. They just start indignantly name-calling immediately, there’s no real engagement anymore. I consider myself to be extremely left wing, but I also live in the real world. They are insufferable.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            I’m blocking a bunch of .world communities and “power users” because of how toxic they are. The same stupid memes over and over insulting people who don’t want to vote for a pro-genocide candidate, condescending attitudes, calling people tankies/bots/shills/Russians etc. I don’t consider that “real engagement”. I consider it self-congratulatory preaching to the choir. No wonder some people are hostile to that kind of nonsense.

            • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              This is exactly the kind of crap I’m talking about. You are literally the first and only person who has ever called me right wing, because I objectively and genuinely hold far left beliefs, and I always have. You don’t know me, and since you obviously don’t want to engage in a good faith conversation, your trolling means nothing to me.

              • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                A very good number of people that claim they are left wing are in fact liberals in disguise. They think they are left wing because they liked Bernie, or believe that Democrats are left wing. A majority of those on the actual left do not identify as ‘left’ they usually identify as socialist, communist, anarchist, etc. rarely left wing.

                And the ones that are usually nasty in their responses are those faux left Democrats that get triggered when they hear something they don’t like.