• P00ptart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s awesome! Now can we cover parking lots in solar panels? Thus giving electricity and shade in one of the hottest environments? I would absolutely give my business to a company that did that.

        • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          People don’t need to park busses and trams, and bikes are easy to park. The need to big parking lots is a symptoms of misguided and destructive urban planning

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            People don’t need to park busses and trams

            What? In cities skylines people can put cars in their pockets but unfortunately that’s impossible in real life. Where the hell are the busses supposed to go then?

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would be so nice to return to a shaded, charged vehicle on a hot sunny day. Seems like a great idea.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am quite furious at a local supermarket installing sun-shades over their parkinglot and it is not solar panels but rather a really stupid looking permanent tent structure that couldn’t even be retrofitted with solar-panels. This is so stupid that I decided to boycott them over this alone.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Na, these ones are super strong and probably cost more than a solar panel installation would have, especially if you factor in the electricity it produces over time. It’s just silly and was probably decided for by some boomer who drives an SUV.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Very little and canopies that shouldn’t accidentally damage cars or people under them need to be regularly checked too.

                I don’t know why you are so hell bend to defend what is obviously a stupid decision, especially since you don’t know the exact situation nearly as well as I do.

                • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I’m not “hell bent” on anything, you’re just misdirecting your anger towards the situation at me.

                  I agree solar panels would be a smarter decision long term. If the cost:benefit worked out as more efficient than a simple canopy, that’s what businesses would do. But it’s a higher up front investment, and that’s the only thing the MBAs see.