cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21648625

From the article:

Unionized machinists at Boeing voted Monday to accept a contract offer and end their strike after more than seven weeks.

Leaders of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers district in Seattle said 59% of members who cast ballots agreed to approve the company’s fourth formal offer and the third put to a vote. The deal includes pay raises of 38% over four years, and ratification and productivity bonuses.

However, Boeing refused to meet strikers’ demand to restore a company pension plan that was frozen nearly a decade ago.

The average annual pay of Boeing machinists is currently $75,608 and eventually will rise to $119,309 under the new contract, according to the company.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Why’s this feel like a car-dealership special: Where you negotiate and negotiate and FINALLY they seem to relent…

    …but it’s still in their favor and they simply shifted the numbers to different variables so you feel like you’re getting a fair deal…

  • astrsk@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m glad the union has a majority in agreement on this step. But Boeing is going to regret not having any long-term skill retention when they all leave for greener pastures because there’s no incentive to stay.

  • halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    So can Boeing just delay raises for 4 years and then replace workers at 3 years 11 months mark, or do they have protections in place? How does that work?

    • Platypus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Boeing can’t really replace workers. The union is so strong because aerospace machining is a very difficult job that takes years and years to learn—if they cut their workforce and start anew, they will lose enough productivity that it won’t be worth whatever wages they save.

      • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This is already part of the problem. You can’t really treat aircraft workers the way they have. When a 40 year worker retires, a new hire isn’t really a replacement. Looking solely at headcount is foolish.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Which also brings up the fact that annual inflation still applies, so realistically it’s more like 6.5% increases. Since annual inflation is usually around 3% or so.

        If you’re not getting about a 3% “raise” each year, you’re getting paid less than you were.

        • halfapage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          This is exactly what I’ve been thinking. It looks like a win, but spread in time like that it is more like no loss at best, or time bought for Boeing to come up with less obvious way to screw workers over at worst.

          Besides, 4 years is a lot of time for a worker. It wouldn’t be surprising if some people would have to leave the company on their own over such time span due to unrelated reasons, missing out on the potential raise. It is probably another factor Boeing counts on.

          I’m glad that at least they got something, but I hope they won’t let their guard down.