• index
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      16 days ago

      I wouldn’t define socialism as just a period of time

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

      I’m wondering about how many houses own the state leader that comes out with the quote “houses are not for speculation”

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        You’re far out of your depth if you are linking the Wiki article on “Socialism” to a Marxist that is recommending a synopsis on Lenin to you.

        If you want something a bit easier to get into than Lenin, I really like the article What is Socialism? It’s a quick, 30 minute read. The gist of the article is that Socialism is about what is dominant within a system, in Socialism central planning, public ownership, and the proletariat at large are dominant, while in Capitalism the bourgeoisie, private ownership, and markets are dominant.

        In the PRC, the public sector makes up half of the economy and is growing, and Capital is trapped in a bidcage model while markets coalesce into monopolist syndicates, making themselves ripe for public ownership and central planning. The PRC is therefore Socialist.

        • index
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          16 days ago

          You’re far out of your depth if you are linking the Wiki article on “Socialism” to a Marxist that is recommending a synopsis on Lenin to you.

          Read the link, socialism date way before Lenin and it’s not a political party.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Read the link, everyone knows that. You don’t have a grand trump card in the wiki link. We are specifically referring to Marxist Socialism, not the nebulous historical usage of the term, because we are on a Marxist community.

            • index
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              16 days ago

              We are specifically referring to Marxist Socialism, not the nebulous historical usage of the term, because we are on a Marxist community.

              That’s a good clarification. I didn’t know this is a marxist community it’s not specified anywhere

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 days ago

                The hammer and sickle if nothing else should give it away. You can talk about other forms of Socialism if you want.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Socialism isn’t a period of time, it’s a stage of development. Meanwhile, you’re making some claim about how many houses Xi owns, so it’s on you to tell us.

        • WarmRegards
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          The guy linked a Wikipedia article on Socialism after you sent him to Verso Books. The brain is so smooth on that one.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            I encourage you to take your own advice and actually study instead of skimming wikipedia. You can start by studying the verso link I gave you earlier.