Summary

Oregon Democrat Janelle Bynum won a seat in the U.S. House, becoming the state’s first Black representative after defeating Republican incumbent Lori Chavez-DeRemer in a closely watched race for Oregon’s 5th Congressional District.

Bynum led by a strong margin in key counties, ensuring a Democratic victory. Her campaign emphasized combatting extremism, reproductive rights, and economic growth, and she received significant support and funding from national Democrats.

While Republicans retain a narrow lead in the overall House, Bynum’s win represents a major gain for Oregon Democrats amid a competitive election cycle.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Right, but every seat Democrats manage to siphon away is one less vote in support of fascism. And House Republicans do a lot of internal fighting. I will laugh out loud if they can’t pick a speaker again, and it somehow affects the timeline for counting the EC votes.

      • Myxomatosis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        13 days ago

        The future will be miserable but I will at least be able to find joy in their failures. The backstabbing and incompetence in the Trump admin will be legendary.

        • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          13 days ago

          Trump was already a paranoid nutcase who fostered an atmosphere of chaos and betrayal the last time he was in office. Given the way his declining mental state has been making him even more hostile and unstable, I can’t imagine how bad it’s going to get this time around.

          • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            13 days ago

            My boss said that if they don’t get anything done in the first 2 years, it’s not likely to happen in the next few. And they’ve been involved with the government since Carter.

            I hope y’all are right.

            • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 days ago

              Doesn’t really matter if the entire Republican Party is behind his ideals (Peter Theil’s cock with a side of project 2025) We have no voice.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        That would be intentional. They’d have to screw with the timeline for counting the EC votes if Trump kicks it between December 17th and January 6th. Otherwise, the House would be obligated to create a Harris/Vance administration.

        • morriscox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          Having the President and the Vice-president be of different parties used to be a thing until a law passed banning that.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            13 days ago

            There’s no law “banning” that. You’re talking about the 12th amendment revising the electoral process so that the VP is elected in a separate EC election, rather than being the runner up in the presidential election.

            That same 12th amendment requires, when a presidential candidate does not have 270 votes, to select the president from the top three candidates based on number of EC votes. If Trump strokes out after they cast their votes on December 17th, no candidate will have received 270 votes. When they go to count the votes on January 6th, the only valid EC votes cast for president will have been cast for Harris, so we get a Harris/Vance ticket.

            The Republicans could spend one vote on Vance for President, allowing the House to vote for him. But then a similar situation happens in the Senate with Walz, and the Senate only gets to choose between the top two VP candidates based on EC votes. We could theoretically end up with a Vance/Walz administration.

      • andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        The dynamics of the game are way different with a Republican Senate and president. I bet they’ll fall in line in a heartbeat if they keep the house.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        Exactly. People forget they not all the republicans are MAGAs. The GOP equivalent of Joe Manchin exists, and they’re going to have a lot of power with a slim majority.

      • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        I don’t know the answer to this and am too drunk to research right now but. I really wonder how many of the people causing ire beforehand are still even left in congress now. I’m worried a lot of the loud voices were replaced with trumpie fucking losers. But again. Just assumption based on my end.

    • Furball
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yep, control runs through California, which is taking its sweet time counting the votes. It will be days before we know who controls the house, although it’s going to be the republicans more likely than not

      • Mouselemming
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        13 days ago

        California’s “sweet time” includes allowing votes postmarked on Election Day to arrive and be counted. You might not be happy waiting but I’m glad to live in a state that values every vote and makes voting as accessible as possible. I won’t say “easy” because our ballot was 6 pages long, but it was easy to read and mark at home, and mail or put in a box or hand to a person.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        13 days ago

        Irresponsible to say “taking it’s sweet time…” these days without also mentioning explicitly that this is the specific effect of decades of a GOP cause to sabotage how votes are collected, processed, tallied and reported.

        • Furball
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          What did the GOP have to do with the vote counting in California? I appreciate California for counting every vote but I’m not sure what republicans had to do with making it slow

            • Furball
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Yes, please explain. Each state manages their own electoral system and California is a deep blue state

              • Snapz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                The answer here is complex and I doubt you actually want depth. But to clarify your statement, each COUNTY within a state manages their own election. California is also one of the biggest states in the country and the population of some counties dwarf the size of entire U.S. states. So the first answer is, it’s a complex operation WITHOUT any obstruction attempts, but we live in this reality, and gop obstruction is rampant and regular at this point.

                An epicenter for election threats and disinformation in California is Shasta County. It will probably take some time for them to dissect all of the subtle ways that this fucked their process, but late in the election cycle, their garbage county supervisors hired a lawyer with no election admin experience to replace the departing competent person who had run elections. Here’s an account from a local paper wrt some of what is allowed to go on in that country:

                "CalMatters’ Sergio Olmos visited last week and reports that the presence of self-appointed election observers has led some elections workers to quit. The observers spend their days at the county’s registrar of voters office on the lookout for any misdeeds related to voter fraud. Though voters are legally allowed to enter the office to observe the election process, staffers report that the observers have been following workers into their breakroom and attempting to open doors to see inside their offices. Their intensity pushed Tanner Johnson to quit after working as an account clerk for more than a year. He says that 10 of the registrar’s 21 employees have also left. *Johnson: “They want to catch us in a lie, so they’ll try to trick you into saying something. A lot of times they’ll be secretly videotaping you or recording you. … I make $19.64 an hour. I’m not going to be a martyr for $19.60 an hour.”

                So that kind of ceaseless, cowardly, undemocratic intimidation has been long present. It leads to stressed, threatened volunteer temporary workers who don’t get paid enough to deal with that bullshit so if nothing else, they naturally slow down. It also leads to high turnover for those positions from the fear/stress, which means people are more likely to be undertrained or frankly, lower quality job candidates as you’ve already cleared out the “starting lineup and the bench” in some cases and then you’re just desperate for any bodies off the street - including some of these pieces of shit themselves that learn the systems so they can purposefully volunteer and obstruct from the inside work challenges to ballots that are false, but require time in a process for people to then come and do a focused verification process to reclear as flagged ballot - like the tidbit that was caught streaming those “sample” verification ballots and then immediately challenging the validity of their elections process because they didn’t have those ballots (that he obviously stole, on camera)

                At the larger systemic level, they’ve challenged valid systems meant to expedite voting and vote processing so much and for so long now, that you’re left (intentionally by these GOP efforts) with a patchwork of disjointed, disconnected and overly careful processing flows that move especially slow to attempt to satisfy their never meaningfully justified “voter fraud” bullshit - claims they are now, suddenly silent about, just like with those “caravans!!!” at the border

                I could write you an essay, but I doubt you actually, truly give a shit.

                • Furball
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  That makes sense, I hadn’t really considered that. Thanks for the detailed answer

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      AP still hasn’t called her. And they have 212 RNC and 200 DNC. So if it’s 201, then republican need 6 to claim majority now.

      • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Thanks, me too! But it’s been awhile since I’ve had a Representative in the House that I was happy with. House districts are too big for their stated purpose OR5 goes from Portland suburbs to Bend

    • xyzzy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      The Republicans were absolutely inundating the district with the most vile stuff, like how she “voted in favor of rapists.” They dramatically outspent her campaign.

      I’m really happy she won.

    • xyzzy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s the most evenly divided district in Oregon in partisan terms and she ran on a “bipartisan” theme. She’d be pretty hard-pressed to make her case.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, I didn’t have a lot of hope that the Dems would have enough neocons left in the House to lean on and stop the absolute worst but they might, might have enough to stop a complete fascist takeover.

  • DrMorose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    My inner cynic is coming to the surface on this one. I would rather the GOP control all 3 branches so it doesn’t give them an excuse that the “other side” is holding back progress or some other bullshit. Yes it would mean unchecked power, but it might be the only way to open people’s eyes…I can’t even finish that because I doubt even that would happen.

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sadly it won’t work that way. I’ve seen republicans vote against legislation. Then go home and claim it with their populous cause dems forced it through. These people are fucking scum.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is spectacular to hear. I have to wonder if the shift in control will exacerbate the issues that prevented the passing of a budget, however. I haven’t thought it through fully yet, but whatever the make up of the senate and house are, passing a budget is priority #1, and how that shakes out is going to be one of, if not the most significant short term effect on the economic situation of regular people.