• Yondoza
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 days ago

    I disagree, I think if you provide ownership of the company as part of compensation you can pay people to care. No big companies do this, but I think they could!

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      There’s plenty of companies with stock options as part of the compensation package. They’re always just a bone thrown in. They absolutely do not want employees to be able to effectively do a hostile takeover of their own company and set it up as some kind of commie worker cooperative.

      • Yondoza
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’ve changed my mind and I’d like to disagree with my previous statement. You can’t pay people to care.

        Very good point. I worked for an employee owned company and I hated the work, but loved the atmosphere. There really was this sense of everyone there working together to make everyone better. I don’t think stock options can provide the same atmosphere, the employees need to have agency around leadership choices as well as the compensation that comes with it.

    • MinusPi (she/they)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      In that case, they then care primarily about the success of the company. The quality of the product is secondary as long as it sells.