• conciselyverbose
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, they literally believed that using the name of gods could get you struck down, cursed, etc. by those gods.

    And nobody is claiming words are physical weapons.

    Both sides of your argument are wild mischaracterizations of reality and neither could plausibly be done in good faith.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I must admit that I never get this recourse to the “bad faith” argument. I’m telling you how I see things. Why would I bother inventing something that I don’t even believe? Mystifying. If you see things differently, fine. I don’t believe I’ve said anything factually incorrect (again: why would I bother playing games?). None of this is hard science anyway, so others can judge the arguments on their merits through the prism of their own values.

      And now I see that you’ve been downvoting my comments systematically. Personally I consider that to be the virtual equivalent of shouting someone down in a debate. So that’s enough for today. Good night.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Every single thing you’ve said is factually incorrect.

        There is no debate about that fact that people historically thought gods would strike people down for words; it’s abundant historical record.

        And nobody anywhere near this thread said anything anyone could possibly interpret to mean that words are the same as physical assault.

        I will always downvote comments using ridiculous nonsense to justify slurs.